Valve World Magazine August 2022 - Sample | Page 51

Fugitive emissions
Figure 10 .
commercially available leak detection solution or may be prepared using concentrated detergent and water . A pressure sprayer or squeeze bottle may be used to dispense the solution . Observe
Soap Bubbles . the potential leak sites to determine if any bubbles are formed . If no bubbles are observed , the source is presumed to have no detectable emissions or leaks as applicable . If any bubbles are observed , the instrument techniques of Section 8.3.1 or 8.3.2 shall be used to determine if a leak exists , or if the source has detectable emissions , as applicable .
Final Thoughts
As can be seen , each component has its own specific section written into how to properly monitor it , per Method 21 . Although this test method is very detailed in explaining how to monitor each interface , leaks are still getting missed . So why is that ? Truly it is all about the speed , angle of the probe to the leaking interface , and making sure that the probe is truly on the leaking interface . By understanding the test methods , and specifically the monitoring locations , an operator or monitor will be able to more effectively find and address the present leaks . With a more comprehensive understanding of Method 21 , the addition of Certified Low Leaking Technology , and the advancements of the standards associated with API 622 , API 624 , API 641 , ASME 16.20 , and ISO 15848 , individuals will be better able to achieve a true reduction in emissions .
About the author Bronson Pate is a Client Relationship Manager with TRICORD Consulting , LLC . Bronson is an LDAR Subject Matter Expert with more than thirteen years of professional experience within the industry . He has participated in and / or led over 275 third party LDAR audits and has worked with multiple facilities to develop LDAR programs both domestically and internationally . www . valve-world . net Valve World August 2022
51