12 beneficial to this essay to display and discuss a non-violent example , ( such as Neville ’ s Bolan Market ) in relation to violent and more disturbing case studies ( such as the images of “ Lenin Fall ” and the image of Alun Kurdi ), as it gives a broader depth of potential reactions and responses to images of conflicts from audiences . Additionally , it is also in keeping with the most different design as n = 3 , as two violent still images ( Lenin-Fall and Alun Kurdi ) are discussed in comparison with a non-violent moving image ( Neville ’ s Bolan Market ).
Although images can effectively catalyse empathetic responses to their subject matter , policy has not evolved correspondingly to the degree that conflicts of a similar nature are not repeated . Furthermore , as this essay will also examine sometimes images alone sometimes do not add to “ our ” understanding of conflicts , with ambiguities remaining present . Yet , despite the aforementioned tensions and irresolutions , this essay will ultimately demonstrate that images possess agency and power in respect of individual understandings around conflict . It will be argued that images do have a purpose and an effect ( if not a direct activist effect ) because if they did not , they would not be used by politicians , journalists , and artists . Likewise , it will also exemplify how images indubitably go some way in documenting and explaining the world to an audience .
Reframing the symbols of 1917 Bolshevik Russia in the Ukraine was never going to be an easy task for any individual : nevertheless , 2013 saw active insurgency on the part of activists
around issues such as anti-government corruption and anti-Russian feeling in the Ukraine , leading to the destruction of the Lenin monuments . ‘ Leninfall ’ was the destruction of the