Trustnet Magazine Issue 40 May 2018 | Page 6

Cover Story Just as important as avoiding companies with low governance scores is looking closely at those that are working hard to improve in this area decile have underperformed over the past six or seven years. So if you want to invest in that type of company, you have to be pretty sure about the other types of financial characteristics.” Just as important as avoiding companies with low governance scores is looking closely at those that are working hard to improve in this area. Lode says this is because investors tend to put a risk premium on a company with poor governance levels, for example. “In financial theory, people talk about a high discount rate for higher risk, so we identify companies that are trying to change. You get rewarded when investors re-evaluate these companies with a lower discount risk.” Social work While the benefits of focusing on good governance are not difficult to grasp – the quality of a company’s management team, how it is remunerated and the degree FE TRUSTNET 4 / 5 LIES AND STATISTICS Gergel says investors should not consider ESG scores as the be-all and end-all and in some cases they can be misleading. For example, the manager recently held a meeting with Shell about its involvement with onshore operations in Nigeria, for which it has been criticised due to widespread instances of oil leakage, theft and corruption. However, Gergel points out that the local population is keen for Shell to stay put. “Shell is probably the most reputable operator of onshore assets in Nigeria and people are worried that if the company pulls out, which would be the easy option, there would be more corruption and less of a focus on standards,” the manager says. “So whereas Shell’s ESG score might go up if it pulls out, it would be likely to have a detrimental effect on the community.”