Trustnet Magazine Issue 33 October 2017 | Page 16

YOUR PORTFOLIO /LONG-TERM FUNDS/ THE NEVER-ENDING wizardry inside the latest iPhone also has its roots in the US national STORY What makes “generational” investment plays suitable for passing on to your children? Daniel Lanyon finds out if there are any funds you should never sell O VER ON WALL STREET, A NEW INVESTMENT STRATEGY dubbed the Chomsky Trade is gaining popularity. Think of it as the polar opposite of the Trump Trade – not only because its namesake is the leftwing intellectual linguist giant Noam, as opposed to the populist demagogue Donald, but also because it’s a very long-term play on the future rather than a bet on a short-lived surge in asset prices. Chomsky has previously said the secret to investing is to research what the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) – a wing of the US Department of Defense responsible for emerging military tech – is throwing its money at and then “go long” in this technology for 30 years. For example, if you’d taken a look at its favourite projects of the 1980s and 1990s, this would have led you to invest in artificial intelligence and machine learning – a very hot market now. In fact much of the underlying tech research budget from decades back. The rewards of this investment philosophy are potentially huge, but of course life’s not so simple. So what does an investor with a very long-term horizon do? “Many of the incumbent dominant companies back then no longer exist now and have fallen prey to the creative destruction of capitalism” 14 Are there funds in which you can tie up your cash while you wait for 2047 to roll around? The costs associated with investing become critical when you are talking about a decades- long horizon. Charges may not seem like such a big deal at the start, but they add up and compound in the same way your investment returns do. You don’t just lose the tiny fees you pay – you also lose all the growth that that money may have delivered – and the growth on that growth – for years into the future. Imagine you have £100,000 invested in the market. If this grew by an average of 6 per cent each year for 25 years and you paid no charges on it, you’d have £430,000 by the end of this period. If, on the other hand, you paid 2 per cent a year in charges, after 25 years you’d have less than £270,000. Just a 2 per cent levy every year would destroy almost 40 per cent of your nest egg. Simon Evan-Cook, a fund Charges may not seem like such a big deal at the start, but they add up and compound in the same way your investment returns do trustnetdirect.com trustnetdirect.com 15