Trustnet Magazine Issue 31 July 2017 | Page 26

IN FOCUS / SECTOR PROFILE / HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF With Brexit the latest event to highlight the problem with open- ended property funds, Adam Lewis asks if investors should rethink their exposure to the asset class A S A SECTOR OF THE MARKET IN WHICH TO INVEST, UK commercial property is never far from the headlines. It seemed investors had forgiven it for its sins of the past the last time Trustnet Magazine profiled it back in May 2015, but then along came Brexit and the yo-yo love affair 24 sprang forth once more. Retail investors panicked and sought to sell their holdings in open-ended UK commercial property funds as soon as possible. The end result, for the second time in the sector’s history, was that many large funds were forced to suspend dealing and place penalties on investors who wanted to remove their cash. The first time was back in 2008 when commercial property prices crashed, and it seems investors have not learnt from their previous mistakes. While he could not have forecast Brexit, Hargreaves Lansdown’s head of research Mark Dampier predicted as much in the previous focus on the sector. At the time, he trustnetdirect.com said: “My worry is what happens where there is a downturn and money flows out again? You could have the very best fund manager, but he will still be forced to sell assets and this will affect the price of the fund.” A RE-THINK Just 13 months later in June 2016, several funds – including Standard Life UK Real Estate, Aviva Property Trust and M&G Property Portfolio – did exactly that. So should investors re-assess their opinion of the asset class and what are the best types of funds to use? There are currently 44 IA Property funds to choose from, but comparing them is no easy task. This is because the sector does not differentiate between geographic areas, property types (residential or commercial) or whether the funds invest directly in bricks trustnetdirect.com “While there are 44 [IA Property] funds, I do not think any of them are suitable for portfolio management services” & mortar or through the listed- shares of property companies. As a result, while Liontrust’s head of multi-asset John Husselbee has an allocation to property in the target risk funds he manages, he has no allocation in his target risk portfolio management service. “This zero weighting is based upon the operational challenges of investing in property, rather than the investment challenges,” he says. “When you are looking for an allocation to property, you have to ask yourself ‘what is available and what is suitable?’ In most cases, the answer is that while there are 44 funds available, I do not think any of them are suitable for portfolio management services.” SLAVES TO PANIC This, says Husselbee is not because of what the funds are trying to do – the best fund in the sector over five years (F&C Real Estate Securities) has produced a return of 147.3 per cent – but more because of how they are slaves to the actions of panicked retail investors. “The sector requires long-term patience and unfortunately for me, the majority of investors are looking to trade and speculate with property,” he says. “They wouldn’t 25