Vibrant, as if woven by light itself, the souls of Protagoras and Kant glided through a dark abyss. Until, in a moment of infinitely small chance, both encounter each other. Since in this world, the luminescence of a soul was determined by a person’ s power of thought, both recognized the other as a wise spirit.
Protagoras spoke first, smiling faintly“ What a joy to find a fellow thinker in this place, what is your name? What do you think of our existence in this state?”
Kant’ s soul, emitting a blazing glow, replied in a stern tone“ My name is Immanuel Kant, I used to work with reason, duty, and the moral law within. I believe that in existence, even in this form, principles of reason are always present. Yourself?”
The Greek philosopher responded respectfully“ I am Protagoras of Abdera, and I hold that humanity is the measure of all things— who are we to judge others without a true moral law, how can we dictate what is right and what is wrong without considering another person’ s thoughts and ideals. Tell me, Kant, do you think your categorical imperative can stand in the face of such relativity?
Kant’ s soul flared briefly as if ignited by the challenge.“ Sophist Protagoras, if humanity is the measure of all things, morality becomes volatile, it becomes tied to opinions and circumstances. The categorical imperative offers a universal principle, grounded not in subjectivity, but in reason. It’ s the perfect standard to which all humans should morally act in accordance with.”
The sophist’ s light shimmered with effervescence.“ But Kant, is reason not something shaped by human experience? Even universal principle is filtered through cultures and perceptions. How can it possibly transcend human diversity?”
The German scholar’ s wispy soul steadied.“ Reason’ s basis is constant, even if expressed differently. The categorical imperative tells us to act only on principles we would will as universal laws— guiding us beyond mere subjectivity, in fact, and instead toward a singular, shared morality.”
Protagoras inclined his essence, warm and intrigued.“ But in seeking this universality, do we not risk imposing one ideal over all others? Real truth arises not from singular foundations, but instead from diverse truths.”
Kant paused, his tone softening.“ Without shared principles, chaos reigns. And yet, dialogue itself may be the bridge— balancing universality with diversity.”
Protagoras’ soul dimmed slightly“ Oh well, dear friend, perhaps it is. We may not truly be enemies, just two intellects walking down a different path towards the same destination, perchance. I admire your conviction, Kant, may we meet again”
Kant’ s soul dittoed the Greek’ s“ Perhaps we are, old sophist. I too, admire your perspective and shall consider it further, thank you for this conversation.”
The void hummed with quiet understanding. Their fiery violet souls drifted apart, leaving faint trails of light— a true testament to the enduring power of ideas.
Travesía • revista estudiantil | 27