Title 6 Complaint | Page 43

Our complaint will describe specifically: 1) a summary description of each discriminatory action or similar discriminatory actions and the date or time period in ongoing pattern of discrimination, 2) how these actions were unethical or inhumane, 3) how these actions had an adverse impact on black, Latino and disabled populations in Michigan compared to other communities, 4) we will show that each of the policies and procedures we outline were not only unnecessary to achieve an educational goal but also 4) there are more ethical, humane, safer, and better policies and procedures with respect to their outcomes in use around the country that would meet the Governor’s stated goals with less of a burden on this disproportionately affected group than the extreme and discriminatory measures taken by the Governor, and 5) the resulting harm or retaliation to individuals filing the complaints. We will discuss the disparate treatment, disparate impact, perpetual effect of discrimination, and impact on the poor, based on the issue. We do not claim to know every instance of the law, but we, as a group of hundreds of people feel strongly that we know right from wrong. Beyond that, we know what discrimination and retaliation feels like. It feels like this. To maintain anonymity, actual complainant quotes which correspond to the complaints attached to this summary are cited here by page number in the Complainant booklet. Actual complaints are an attachment included in the appendix of the document. Unless otherwise noted or determined at a later date we request that the Department of Justice send responses and questions: Herman Davis 18428 Cherrylawn St. Detroit, MI 48221 313-354-6708 or a designee authorized by the above individual. While we must depend on the Civil Rights Department to judge the merits of the complaint, to help accomplish a determination of whether or not the circumstance was ethics, the document also relies upon ethics codes and standards from the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University (which has sponsored an active program of research on government ethics for the last 25 years) and professional standards for fields corresponding to related issues. We also will rely on the expertise of organizations which have knowledge about best practices in certain fields. The theme of this complaint is whether a Government authority can successfully assert that they are taking a specific action to provide a service (like education) for a group of people when to achieve those lofty stated goals, they risk the life, health, civil rights, quality of life, and &