Thunder Roads Colorado Magazine Volume 11 Issue 4 | Page 8

What is a State Motorcycle Rights Organization (SMRO) and what does a SMRO Do? My name is Stump. I’m the Legislative Affairs Officer for ABATE of Colorado (ABATE). ABATE is a State Motorcycle Rights Organization (SMRO). In this article I’m going to tell you a little bit about ABATE; some Legislative issues every motorcycle enthusiast should be concerned about; and what you can do to preserve your motorcycle freedoms and ride your bike the way you want to. ABATE was incorporated as a non-profit SMRO on August 3, 1983. In Colorado, ABATE stands for A Brotherhood Active Towards Education and this is our mission statement: ABATE of Colorado exists to preserve freedom of the road, to unite motorcyclists, to promote fair legislation, safety, and rider education and to provide a network for communication on issues affecting motorcyclists. We are dedicated to: • Fostering brotherhood and unity among motorcyclists. • Promoting motorcycle safety and education for both riders and the public. • Monitoring the government on all levels regarding issues affecting motorcyclists. • Improving driver awareness in an effort to make the roads safer for motorcyclists. • Reporting the facts about issues concerning motorcyclists and countering biased news reporting concerning motorcyclists. • Presenting and reporting a positive public image of motorcycling in Colorado and the nation. As for legislative issues of concern to motorcyclists, the first thing most motorcycle enthusiasts think of is a mandatory helmet law. ABATE supports the voluntary use of rider safety apparel but believes the right to decide belongs to the rider. ABATE does not, and will not, support mandatory helmet laws. In the 2015 Colorado legislative session, one Representative stated he was going to propose a mandatory helmet law, but it didn’t happen. Might someone propose one this year? If statistics show a sharp rise in motorcycle fatalities in Colorado this year, that might prompt some lawmakers to consider a helmet bill. So wouldn’t it be imperative that we keep accurate statistics? Have you seen the new Polaris “Slingshot” or the “TukTuk” (auto-rickshaw) on the roads? Or Toyota’s “Elio” or I-Road (fully enclosed, three-wheeled vehicles with steering wheels, seat belt and airbags)? These are all classified as motorcycles here in Colorado and in many other states as well. With possibly more three-wheeled vehicles coming on the market, is it time to have a separate classification for these vehicles, so as not to skew the statistics about motorcycles? Other states have passed legislation to classify these as 6 Thunder Roads Magazine® Colorado “autocycles”, should Colorado do the same? So, how many of you ride your bike in HOV lanes? Did you get your transponder yet? Since federal law classifies a motorcycle as a HOV [per 23 U.S.C. 166 (b) (2) (A)], doesn’t it seem wrong that you’d have to set up an account for $35 to ride for free in a HOV lane? Of course, you might not use the HOV lanes on I-25 or U.S. 36 right now or maybe only occasionally, but how about in the future when more and more “toll” roads are implemented the way that CDOT is proposing? How many of you have ridden your bikes or driven in California? Have you noticed or tried lane-splitting? (Legal in California and not currently legal in Colorado.) I’m sure each of you has an opinion as to whether or not it’s a safe practice, or a bad idea. Does lan