TheOverclocker Issue 42 | Page 10

“With the Champion, you’re looking at a product that is by all means a culmination of what the company is capable of...” In fact, the approach I used was to get the scores first, then tweak them higher via the Mesh frequency as it can have an unpredictable effect on maximum memory frequency etc. So, being the person I am, I’d rather isolate the different parts of the system, rather than hope that the memory runs well enough in tandem with a high Mesh frequency. That aside, the Champion perhaps in line with the previous X99 board has some difficulty with 1T command rate is used. This ultimately won’t make much of a difference in the newer benchmarks, but for those still running the older ones this can have huge implications and you 10 The OverClocker Issue 42 | 2017 may have to compensate for it in other ways. For instance, running 1T reliably over 3,733MHz may prove troublesome, but with enough manual tuning you probably could. I had neither the time nor skill to achieve this, but have seen others do it so I know it is possible. I settled on 2T and tried to optimize somewhere else for performance. When it comes to the standard XOC C12 or C11 4000MHz runs, the Champion may not be able to achieve this either, but that was with the X11X BIOS and older. The newer versions and the newer board are likely to have this sorted, but this was my experience with the original board. Much like with the command rate, but perhaps more pronounced, you’ll have to find the performance somewhere else, or simply settle for more relaxed primary timings and tighten the secondary and tertiary timings even more. Whatever your solution, it is clear that you can compensate for these as shown by the massive number of global first place benchmark results that this motherboard achieved. Ultimately, while these could be limiting, you have to realize that you’d actually have to test efficiency before assuming that you’re losing it compared to another board which can do all this with relative ease. There’s a lot to board performance and, as you may know, the CPU sample plays a huge role in where a board places itself in the rankings and what scores are achieved. On paper there may be a clear and better board, but in practice and when you count the results at any given time, you may find the opposite is true or not so clear. So once again, you have to decide what matric you’re using and realize that no board is going to magically generate efficient scores for you at this level because you have to tune that yourself. During the initial run with the