TheOverclocker Issue 41 | Page 24

is not supported, which again makes you wonder why they have a dual LAN configuration at all, given its limited use cases. Nonetheless it doesn’t hurt to have this ability. We then have the audio part as well which shows a similar configuration using two ALC 1220 Codecs. One for your headphones and one for your speakers. On top of this is layered the Sound Blaster X-Fi MB5 software. This configuration works fairly well and the benefits of using the X-Fi MB software are obvious. A cost effective solution probably (software wise) but perhaps undone by the redundancy of having a second Codec. I’m of the opinion that better component use elsewhere would benefit the audio in a more meaningful way. As mentioned in a previous GIGABYTE board review, GIGABYTE has changed their policy on fan support and control so you can more readily control each fan and the headers can accommodate both PWM 24 The OverClocker Issue 41 | 2017 and DC fans. There’s also a lot more fan headers as well, which is always welcome. Since we are TheOverclocker, we will leave the rest of the product features for more generic reviews and focus on performance. It’s impossible to make this a motherboard review without it being a Ryzen 1700X review to some degree. That said, what is being shown by the performance figures is the scaling of the board and how the ability to run 3600, 3400 and 3200 reliably affects performance. Before we head into the performance analysis though it’s important that we point out some issues we may have with the board in its present state. Once again, if I had to pick any one motherboard to live with for the AM4 socket it would definitely by the K7, but that doesn’t mean it’s perfect. The reason I’d choose this motherboard is simply because of how fast it is out the box, with little to no tuning needed. The point that I was making though is that within the F4d BIOS, there are things that still need ironing out, which GIGABYTE is hopefully aware off and will sort out in future updates. Number one, which isn’t unique to the Gaming K7 is how Load line calibration is handled. This is a legacy issue that for some reason is proving difficult or impossible to sort out. It’s how these various levels of LLC are presented. AUTO, Normal, Medium and Standard are synonymous. That is, there settings all mean the same thing in the English language as observed within the context of motherboards. The same goes for Turbo, High performance and extreme performance. Moreover, there’s the issue of settings with no explanation of what the setting does or how it affects the system. The M.I.T also has some issues which are largely legacy and usability ones. Not being able to see current values for your settings can prove problematic as well. So these are some of the things that take