TheOverclocker Issue 20 | Page 27

Benchmarks All results were obtained at 4600MHz s on a normal install of Windows 7 64-bit. These are our results, yours may vary so only use these as a guideline for a similarly configured system. Clocks 3DMark03 3DMark06 3DMark Vantage 3DMark11 UniGine Heaven Xtreme GIGABYTE GV-N67OC 980MHz/1.5GHz 106759 34186 37018 34652 9647 Graphics: 9366 1922.52 GIGABYTE GV-N67OC OC 1.09/1.65GHz 109388 34159 38031 GPU: 35801 9836 Graphics: 9560 2026.011 Reference GTX 680 1GHz/6GHz 108937 34290 37689 GPU: 35428 10101 Graphics: 9863 1961.453 With no voltage or fan speed adjustments at all, we were able to reach a comfortable 1098MHz on the core and 1.65GHz on the memory. The memory was a little disappointing given that it’s at 1.5GHz by default so we had expected something around 1.7GHz. Nonetheless we were satisfied with the overclock and the great thing about the overclock is that it allowed the card to match a reference GTX680 in performance. Not bad considering that a GTX680 would cost you at least $100 more than this card. With such performance the value of the 670OC is increased sizeably and provided you are willing to apply this overclock on system start up, you’ve essentially bagged yourself a GTX 680 without having to dig as deep. We are satisfied with the GIGABYTE GV-N670OC and in light of the changes to NVIDIA’s policies this card by virtue of being $399 USD is seen in a more positive light. Sure enough, GIGABYTE could have gone for better components all around and an even beefier cooler than they have, a special BIOS and the like. It it would have been for naught because as per our attempts with the EVGA GTX 680 Classified, without the banned unlocked BIOS versions and software, the card has virtually identical limitations to significantly cheaper, less complex cards. So GIGABYTE has in a way cut costs for them and for us with this card. Had it been a few months earlier, this card would have been less impressive because it really isn’t anything amazing component and cooling wise, but now we have to appreciate it in a more general user context as NVIDIA with the six series put itself out of favour as far as extreme overclocking is concerne d or at least has made AMD’s job substantially easier in attracting the extreme or competitive overclocker. If you want an efficient, quiet and fairly easy to overclock graphics card, you could do a lot worse than the GIGABYTE offering. At $399 it’ll deliver GTX 680 performance with just a few pushes of a couple of sliders. Consider this card if gaming is your primary concern as you’re unlikely to be disappointed at all. [ The Overclocker ] Summary GIGAYTE has kept it simple enough while making their card significantly different enough from reference GTX 670 cards to make it worth the investment. The relatively low price for a non- reference card is a boon if only because it ensures your overclocks are a little more stable. This is particularity true when you’re shooting for those GTX 680 performance matching clocks. We aren’t’ sure if there’ll be an SOC version of this card, but if so we’d be interested to see how much further it will allow the cut down 670 to scale above the standard 680. Would you buy it? Sure, it’s a great gaming card. We just wouldn’t bother with it for competitive overclocking. The Score 8/10 Issue 20 | 2012 The OverClocker 27