The TRADE 79 - Q1 2024 | Page 84

[ S U R V E Y | A L G O R I T H M I C T R A D I N G ]

JP Morgan

There was plenty of responses to this year ’ s survey when it comes to JP Morgan , with 115 traders taking part , a significant increase from the 87 of last year . The majority of responses came from Europe ( 50 %) and the UK ( 27 %) with 49 % holding an AUM of $ 50bn or more .

Looking at recent developments , last year , JP Morgan expanded its rates algo franchise to support the wider electronification of rates trading . The expansion made JP Morgan ’ s rates algo offering equal to its long-standing FX offering .
For the second year in a row , JP Morgan saw a fall in their average overall score , coming in at 5.62 . Across the board there has been steady declines in the scores , with each category only falling into “ good ”, with not a single score managing to be awarded as a category outperformer .
Taking the top spot , however , is ease of use , with a score of 5.91 , this is up marginally from last year .
Although respondents ’ comments are sparse this year , one response that stands out says the “ pre / post-execution is the best ” perhaps encouraging this boost in the score . Similarly , it may have influenced the slight uptick in the increase trader productivity category , which moved up three basis points since last year .
What is interesting is that when it comes to algo monitoring , JP Morgan scored in the bottom three places , across our surveyed providers . This is particularly noteworthy as one trader commented that it is “ an excellent algo , top 5 for me ”. So , while it may not be up to everyone ’ s standards , there are still long-only managers who are happy with the algo ’ s provided by JP Morgan .
Only 13 % of buy-side traders reported to looking to make use of additional algorithmic trading providers in the next 12 months , down significantly from the 23 % last year .
JP MORGAN RATINGS FOR ALGORITHMIC PERFORMANCE
Increased trader productivity
Reduced market impact
Execution consistency
Cost Speed Anonymity Price improvement Customisation
5.86 5.66 5.67 5.69 5.69 5.65 5.50 5.35
Ease of use
Order routing logic / analysis
Customer support
Execution consulting
Dark pool access
Flexibility and sophistication of SOR
Algo monitoring
Average score
5.91 5.41 5.76 5.45 5.79 5.51 5.35 5.62
KEY STATS Overall Outperformer : NO Category Outperformer : NO

5.91 Highest score

( Ease of use )

5.35 Lowest score ( Algo monitoring )

0.03

Most improved ( Increase trader productivity )

-0.44

Least improved ( Algo monitoring )
84 // TheTRADE // Q1 2024