The TRADE 59 - Q1 2019 | Page 26

[ T R A D E T E C H F X U S 2 0 1 9 ] BUY-SIDE URGED TO BETTER UNDERSTAND UNDERLYING LIQUIDITY IN FX ALGOS PANELLISTS AGREED THAT THE BUY-SIDE HAS A BETTER GRASP ON HOW ALGOS OPERATE, BUT LESS SO ABOUT THE UNDERLYING LIQUIDITY. will be competing in the algo space and will have to differentiate them- selves in terms of execution quality. As a liquidity provider, we want to be measured since we are confi- dent in our quality of execution.” Conference delegates were polled on the different factors taken into account when measuring liquidi- ty, with a majority of 45% stating that market impact was the most important factor, followed by bid/ offer spread which 39% of the au- dience said was most important. “As we can see from the poll, market impact is also a big deal,” Asif Razaq, global head of FX auto- mated execution, BNP Paribas, told delegates. “You can have a conver- sation with a liquidity provider and ask what is the liquidity behind the “Moving forward, the buy-side needs to understand the types of liquidity those algos are seeking, because aggressive liquidity seeking algos are very different from passive liquidity seeking algos.” KEVIN KIMMEL, CITADEL SECURITIES I nstitutional investors have been urged to gain a better under- standing of the underlying liquidity in FX algorithms by major market makers and sell-side institutions. Panellists from Citadel Securities, XTX Markets, BNP Paribas and Jefferies agreed that the buy-side now has a good understanding of how algorithms in FX work, but need to focus on the underlying liquidity behind the algos. “The buy-side themselves, I 26 // TheTrade // Spring 2019 would say, have a firm grasp on how algorithms operate, but less of an understanding about the under- lying liquidity. Moving forward, the buy-side needs to understand the types of liquidity those algos are seeking, because aggressive liquid- ity seeking algos are very different from passive liquidity seeking algos,” said Kevin Kimmel, global head of eFX at Citadel Securities. “It’s a conversation between the buy-side and the banks, and banks algo, what the market impact is, and for the sell-side to be flexible and willing to make changes, con- stantly changing liquidity profiles for the client, is also important.” At TradeTech FX in Europe in September, a panel of buy- and sell- side market participants agreed that transaction cost analysis (TCA) on FX algos has proven to be a useful tool for asset managers seeking a better understanding on algo performance.