The TRADE 2019 Algo Survey - Hedge Fund | Page 15

[ A L G O R I T H M I C T R A D I N G S U R V E Y ] Goldman Sachs G oldman Sachs recorded a significant increase in the percentage of responses it received from hedge fund firms in this year’s survey, with just under half of those managing over $10 billion in AuM. Goldman Sachs saw its overall rating stay consistent with its score from last year’s survey, recording an average of 5.57 this year, a marginal decrease of 0.03 year-on-year, and slightly below the survey-wide average of 5.72. The bank’s scores across the 15 areas of performance under review were rather more varied, with seven categories recording increased year-on- year scores and six showing a year-on-year decrease. The most notable areas of improvement for Goldman Sachs were for cost (up 0.47), ease of use (up 0.35) and dark pool access (up 0.35), while there were marginal increases in a further four categories. There were several instances where hedge fund respondents handed out significantly lower scores for Goldman Sachs compared to last year, most noticeable in the execution consulting (down 0.64), customer support (down 0.49), reducing market impact (down 0.40) and execution consistency (down 0.63) categories. Goldman Sachs was also attributed the lowest score of all profiled providers in the execution consistency category (5.32). GOLDMAN SACHS RATINGS FOR ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE Increase trader productivity Reduce market impact Execution consistency Cost Speed Anonymity Price improvement Customisation 5.69 5.36 5.32 5.83 5.70 5.63 5.70 5.21 Ease of use Customer support Execution consulting Dark pool access Flexibiltiy and sophistication of smart order routing Algo monitoring capabilities Data on venue/order routing logic or analysis Average score 6.08 5.69 5.27 5.70 5.42 5.09 5.80 5.57 KEY STATS 6.08 5.09 50% Highest score (ease of use) Lowest score (algo monitoring capabilities) Most popular non-equity asset traded via algo by respondents Exchange-traded funds +0.46 -0.64 43% Most improved year-on-year score (cost) Least improved year-on-year score (execution consulting) Most used algo performance measurement method: Implementation shortfall TCA Issue 60 // TheTradeNews.com // 91