The TRADE 2019 Algo Survey - Hedge Fund | Page 12

[ A L G O R I T H M I C T R A D I N G S U R V E Y ] Citi C iti saw an almost fourfold increase in the level of percentage of responses it received from hedge funds in this year’s survey, with respondents coming from a relatively even split of AuM brackets. Citi’s overall score in this year’s hedge fund survey dropped by 0.15 to 5.24, well below the survey-wide average of 5.72, the lowest total of all the profiled providers. The bank will have cause to be concerned with the scores provided by hedge fund respondents, which ranked Citi with the lowest scores of all profiled providers in 5 of the 15 performance categories reviewed: increas- ing trader productivity (4.92), reducing market impact (5.13), price improvement (5.10), ease of use (5.13) and customer support (5.35). The most marked year-on- year area of declining performance for Citi was in the customer support category, which scored highly in 2018 (6.18), but saw a decline of 0.83 in this year’s survey, while there were other noticeably lower scores for ease of use (down 0.76), increasing trader produc- tivity (down 0.45) and price improvement (down 0.39). Citi recorded year-on-year improvements for cost (up 0.30) and customisation (up 0.19). CITI RATINGS FOR ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE Increase trader productivity Reduce market impact Execution consistency Cost Speed Anonymity Price improvement Customisation 4.92 5.13 5.34 5.24 5.14 5.26 5.10 5.48 Ease of use Customer support Execution consulting Dark pool access Flexibiltiy and sophistication of smart order routing Algo monitoring capabilities Data on venue/order routing logic or analysis Average score 5.13 5.35 5.48 5.24 5.32 5.34 5.11 5.24 KEY STATS 5.48 4.92 50% Highest score (execution consulting/ customisation) Lowest score (improve trader performance) Most popular non-equity asset traded via algo by respondents: Exchange-traded funds +0.30 -0.83 42% Most improved year- on-year score: (cost) Least improved year-on-year score: (customer support) Most used algo performance measurement method: Implementation shortfall TCA 88 // TheTrade // Summer 2019