The Spelt Project 1, July 2014 | Page 31

THE CASE FOR ROUNDUP Farmers like Gary and Bill have a measured response to chemicals. Roundup, a glysophate used as a broad spectrum herbicide in contemporary cropping programs, is considered a benign chemical by mainstream agribusiness, with some enthusiasts going so far as to say it is safe enough to drink. Some of the farmers who use Roundup are coming from a background where herbicides such as 245T – otherwise known as Agent Orange – were widely used in the 1960s and 1970s. This product contained dioxin: a ‘chemical impurity’ highly toxic to humans that was banned by governments across Australia in the 1980s and 90s. (http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/ stories/2013/07/22/3806111.htm) In this context Roundup appears a palatable proposition, but concerns about its potential harmful effects persist. Roundup’s heavy use in agriculture can be seen as analogous to the situation in bio-medicine, where overuse of antibiotics has led to new strains of bacteria that are immune to previously effective medicines. 29 The local thistles