The Specialist Forum Volume 13 No 11 November 2013 | Page 65

CPD ARTICLE Impact of reperfusion therapy for acute ischaemic stroke Dr Johan Roos, Jamie Jooste, Dr Mark Abelson, Mediclinic Vergelegen, Western Cape Abstract Stroke remains a devastating disease. We believe the future of stroke therapy will parallel the evolution of treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction, recognising that early reperfusion is critical to success. In an era of older and newer reperfusion strategies applied in our stroke unit we did a retrospective analysis of our data base of all stroke patients admitted to the hospital from August 2011 – September 2012 (total of 196). Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that each year 15 million people suffer strokes worldwide. Stroke claims the lives of 5.8 million people and another five million are left permanently disabled annually. Thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke was introduced in 1995 when the results of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Study with intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were published. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III trial suggested that extension up to 4.5 hours may also be safe and effective. A pooled analysis of eight major trials with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) showed that the net benefit of tPA disappears beyond 4.5 hours. It often fails to achieve reperfusion (particularly in large vessel occlusions), and is associated with a significant bleeding risk. Several attempts to develop thrombolytics with a better risk benefit profile than tPA failed. Third generation thrombolytics like desmoteplase are more fibrin specific with less neurotoxicity. Trials with this agent are still ongoing. The Efficacy and Safety Study of Desmoteplase to Treat Acute Ischaemic Stroke 4 would also include subjects up to nine hours addressing the issue of what to do with strokes out of the 4.5 hours time range. The recently published results of the International Stroke Trial 3 for IV tPA up to six hours unfortunately turned out to be negative. It became evident from analysing the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study that IV tPA was not effective in large vessel stroke, which includes the internal carotid, proximal middle cerebral, basilar and vertebral arteries. Strokes due to occlusion of these arteries have a particularly high mortality and morbidity with very poor A B C Figure 1: A 66-year old female presents at six hours with dense right hemiplegia and aphasia. NIHSS score = 23. A shows critical stenosis at origin of right internal carotid artery (lateral view). Treated by gentle balloon angioplasty only. B shows complete occlusion of the distal internal carotid where it bifurcates to anterior and middle cerebral arteries due to embolism from the proximal carotid lesion (lateral view). C shows complete restoration of cerebral blood flow following embolectomy using the Merci retriever (anterior view). The patient had a good recovery (MRS = 2). Cardiology & Stroke Forum | November 2013 functional outcomes, especially if revascularisation could not be achieved. In a meta-analysis of the impact of reperfusion on stroke outcomes, successful recanalisation of the affected artery was by far the most important factor in improving stroke survival and functional outcomes (mortality 14.4% versus 41.6%, good outcome 58.1% versus 24.8% respectively). The Merci Retrieval System was the first mechanical thromboembolectomy device developed for intracranial treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in August 2004 for patients who fail or who are ineligible for IV tPA. The Multi-Merci study showed successful recanalisation occurred in 68%. In those patients successfully recanalised a good outcome (Modified Rankin Score (MRS) at 90 days post-stroke ?2) was seen in 49% versus 9.9% in those where recanalisation failed. Mortality outcomes were 25% versus 52% respectively. New devices for mechanical embolectomy have become available over the last couple of years; including the Solitaire (EV-3) and Trevo stent retrievers and the Penumbra system. The stent retrievers are quicker and technically easier to use with a significantly higher reperfusion rate (80+%) and less haemorrhage. The Swift Study comparing the Merci device to Solitaire in patients with large strokes who had failed IV tPA or who were ineligible and was stopped early as Solitaire was shown to be better. The Trevo 2 study also showed superiority versus the Merci device with similar efficacy compared to the Solitaire. Both these devices are currently available in SA. In a study of 88 large ischaemic strokes due to acute middle cerebral artery occlusion patients received either IV tPA or, in those where IV tPA was contra-indicated, embolectomy using the Solitaire device. Despite the fact that those patients who underwent embolectomy had significantly larger strokes (National Institute of Health and Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 14 versus 21) and strokes were of longer duration (134min versus 234min), a favourable clinical outcome (MRS ? 2) was seen significantly more frequently in the embolectomy patients (60% versus 37.5% p<0.001). Regarding diagnostic imaging in acute stroke, the Alberta Stroke Programme Early Computed Tomography Score (Aspects) is an easy to use modality to assess a patient’s suitability to receive reperfusion therapy. Although the Aspects score has been criticised as being archaic and that we should use the more modern imaging modalities (multi-modal computed tomography (CT), perfusion CT and CT angiography or diffusionweighted imaging-perfusion magnetic resonance imaging mismatch) these imaging techniques are not always readily available, are more expensive and, of most importance, more time consuming -considering the principal of time is brain. Time to intervention post-stroke onset is an area of ongoing study. Intravenous thrombolysis is of no benefit beyond 4.5 hours while intraarterial tPA was shown to be of some benefit up to six hours post-stroke onset. Mechanical embolectomy studies have included patients up to eight hours and occasionally beyond with good outcomes in appropriately selected patients. In individuals with good collateral circulation, particularly via the pial arteries, the ischaemic brain may remain viable, although nonfunctional, for up to 12 hours or more post stroke onset and these patients Page 7