no mutual understanding and therefore agreement/
consent is not achieved.
Even when explicit consent has occurred, one is not
‘Governed’ by another who is being fraudulent.
As a maxim, ‘equity does not aid a volunteer’
Do Governments presume you to be a volunteer
because you carry a drivers license, were assigned a
social security number, or received a birth certificate?
Did your mom know that filling out an application
for a birth certificate for her child would obligate
you to the extraction of 50% of your energy and
subject you to a bazillion rules? Maybe what your
mom consented to, was not mutually understood,
and therefore consent was not achieved. Drivers
License? Marriage License? Social Security?
Duty of Allegiance in return for a Duty of
Protection? If the courts have ruled over and over
again that Police do not have a duty of protection,
and that Governors, Mayors, etc. etc. are under no
obligation to serve the people, do you have a duty
of allegiance to a Government?
Can there be a Trust relationship if there is no
consideration? What other possible consideration is
there for Government other than duty to serve or
protect? Any?
Even the clearest form of consent, explicit consent,
to another who is being fraudulent, is lack of
consent and also evidence that the fraudulent party
is guilty of ‘breach of trust