EQUITY OR CONTRACT LAW A CONSEQUENCE OF TRUST
tion of injustice. Instead of honoring another’s
In Trust Law and by extension Equity or ‘Contract’ Law,
distorting awareness; by withholding knowledge of the
sharing the truth one has gained in relation to a thing is
truth.
inalienable right to freely choose, they seek to
abrogate or ‘sidestep’ their free will by limiting or
described as full disclosure and transparency.
Consent is the part of a Contract wherein beings freely
If an action is taken by one, and it affects another, the
exercise their choice to agree or disagree, known as
question becomes: ‘was this disclosed fully to ensure
Acceptance. Consent has two polarization’s: explicit and
that the other freely chose to be so affected?’ If one
implied or tacit. Explicit consent is a verbal or written
notifies another of their intent to do something, was this
statement which represents an acknowledgement of the
notic e acknowledged by the other and due diligence
truth within another person’s mind. If the truth is not
followed to ensure that the other did in fact
reflected in the minds of the person agreeing, no explicit
acknowledge it within their mind?
consent was given, no trust was established and harm
has been done. Tacit procuration or implied consent
Anytime our actions affect another being, there is a
is an assumption that one agrees based on inaction or
contractual relationship in place, requiring an
lack of explicit consent; after an action has already been
establishment of Trust in order for the contract to be
taken.
honorable and binding. Once two or more beings have
garnered trust - are on the same page - they can work
Generally speaking, when we take actions based on an
together to manifest a mutual interest, this is known as
assumption that others ‘don’t mind or agree’, especially
a Contract. The quality of trust established determines if
when we were capable of asking first, this is a dishonor-
harm or beach of trust has taken place.
able contract and creates harm implicitly because free
will was never able to act. Now these harmed individuals
The two pole’s of behavior in relationship to a Trust are
must take a defensive action, to make an explicit state-
honor and dishonor; truth vs falsehood, co-creation vs
ment they do not consent to being affected in this way.
manipulation. In order for two minds to co-create with
mutual interest, they must ‘be of the same mind ,’ they
must share an equal awareness and understanding of the
STATUTORY CODE OR POLICY A CONSEQUENCE OF CONSENT
thing they are working to achieve in their minds. There
The free will of individuals acting in concert with others
must be trust between them.
establishes the basis for collective agreements, these are
If one has a nefarious intent, and misrepresents
known as societies, cultures and nations. When a people
themselves or the goal in question (lies), they are not
come together and agree to act in concert, the processes
on the same page, and therefore there is no trust. Any
and procedures of this agreement are known as pro-
time deception, coercion or manipulation are employed
tocols or rules. These are legal codes and polices of a
by one in relation to another, there is no trust and the
nation or government, referred to as Statutes - which the
person or persons performing these actions is
citizenry has agreed to follow. When a policy
dishonoring those who are affected by them; harming
officer (policeman) observes a citizen ‘not following the
another by depriving them of choice - the very defini-
rules’ this is called a crime, requiring investigation as to
TheSovereignVoice.Org