who is responsible so charges can be filed against that
the present ‘justice systems’ on Earth, we must
person for adjudication; an attempt ‘to make it right’. It
understand why governments have breached the public
is presumed we agree to the rules, and the penalties for
trust. A legitimate government gains explicit consent
violating them. But since we did not explicitly consent,
by the people meaning full disclosure of the truth and
and these rules were misrepresented as obligations,
a venue to air grievances. This reality is reflected in the
there is the authorities are in breach of trust. Real harm
Declaration of Independence:
might have occurred, but systems of justice today create
more harm then the so-called criminals they claim to
“...That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from
bring to justice.
the consent of the governed”
In order for a code of conduct to be honorable - so
called laws within governments and nations explicit
Given the definition of honor above, Government is
consent must be provided by each citizen. This is a
required to establish a public trust, based on full
crucial aspect of justice which nearly every
disclosure and explicit consent of all beings who are
government on Earth has failed to address. By
affected. However, on Earth there are no such systems of
presuming we consent, and taking actions that affect the
explicit consent, only bodies which act to provide
people, they rob us of our right to choose. Even if the
benefits that were never duly agreed upon. They have
action taken by government is of benefit, harm has still
failed in their duty to disclose the whole truth, and
be done, requiring justice.
provide a venue for others to voice concerns (airing of
grievances) facilitating negotiation for all involved to
Because implied consent is an assumption of agreement,
ensure that any action taken by the collective does not
a presumption that those affected know the truth, it is
harm even one individual. A government can be
always a breach of trust to act on it and any
legitimate and honorable if it acknowledges Natural
resulting contracts are dishonorable; null and void at
Law, and the ITNJ seeks to begin this process of
their creation. Governments the world over employ tacit
establishing a true form of Justice and taking defensive
or implied consent to rule the people. This is known as a
actions where needed.
de facto government, which gains consent by
acquiescence or the inaction of the people to ‘stand up
Using this objective definition of Justice, derived from
and say otherwise.’ It is the duty of honorable
the causal consequences of Natural Law, there are no
government to perform due diligence and ensure all
legitimate systems available for the task of holding
those affected by it have freely exercised their right to
illegitimate governments accountable. Democracy is
choose. And it is the duty of the people to take defensive
a system of government wherein a majority can agree
actions to restore the justice when harm has been done
to over rule a minority, even when harm occurs; and
by government.
is therefore dishonorable