The SCORE 2016 Issue 1 | Page 31

• The individual has acted inconsistently with the stated belief; • The requested accommodation is particularly beneficial and could be sought for secular purposes; • The timing of the request for accommodation is suspicious (e.g., right after the request had been previously denied); or • There are other circumstances casting doubt on sincerity. There is No Requirement of Clear Notice of the Religious Belief This past summer, the Supreme Court ruled against retailer Abercrombie & Fitch, which refused to hire a woman who wore a headscarf that did not comply with the company’s dress code. When she was interviewed, she did not say why she wore the headscarf, and she was not asked if it was due to her religious beliefs. In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that it did not matter that the employer “did not know” the employee had a religious belief or practice that needed an accommodation and that there was no requirement for an employee to make a specific request for a religious accommodation. Instead, an employer is liable for religious discrimination if it makes an adverse employment action when it has reason to suspect that there is a religious basis for the person’s conduct. In this particular case, even though \