The Review Spring 2013 | Page 2

The Coalition’s Care Cost Proposals The Small Print The Government’s new proposals to cap the costs of care have been headline news. To cover this expense the Coalition will freeze the Inheritance Tax threshold at £325,000 for individuals until 2019. We question whether the proposals will really be beneficial. Presently, if you require residential care and have more than £23,250 in assets you are responsible for paying these fees, unless you are eligible for NHS continuing care. Once assets dwindle to £23,250, the Local Authority contributes towards care costs. When assets decrease to £14,250, the Local Authority pays costs completely. For most, this results in a significant amount being spent before the Local Authority steps in. The new proposals are to cap the costs of care that a person will pay over their lifetime to £75,000, and to increase the threshold after which a person will pay for their care from £23,250 to £123,000. So what is in the small print? First, the cap of £75,000 only applies to social care costs. This excludes accommodation, food, social activities and the like. The bulk of a weekly care fee comprises these “hotel” costs, and only a small amount will qualify as “care costs”. Therefore, you will still pay a considerable amount in additional costs to a care home before you reach the £75,000 cap. Second, care costs are based on the amount a Local Authority will pay if it were responsible for meeting full costs. Local Authorities vary, and will only be willing to pay a certain amount, with individuals having to meet the shortfall for a better-than-basic care provision. Third, the £123,000 threshold is not as generous as first appears. Average house prices far exceed this. Therefore most individuals will be self-funding. Finally, the minimum threshold of £14,250 has been raised to £17,000. This is a minimal increase and those between the £17,000 and £123,000 band will still contribute towards the cost of care. P1