The RenewaNation Review 2015 Volume 7 Issue 2 | Page 32

The “Three R’s” of a Church & School Partnership By Pastor Troy Keaton F OR THE PAST SEVEN YEARS, our community has been blessed to have a Christian school. Founded in 2008 by a group of eager parents and leaders, Smith Moun- tain Lake Christian Academy (SMLCA) has been a small but positive presence in our rural lake community in Virginia. Just prior, in February 2006, EastLake Community Church (ELCC) began with a vision to multiply believers, leaders, and churches.   These two Christian organizations were unrelated and only distantly connected until February 2015. At that time, the church’s relationship with the school became much deeper when the respective boards of SMLCA and ELCC voted unanimously to bring the school under the ministry umbrella of the church. This would mean that the church would now provide leadership, vision, and future facilities for the school. We were literally taking full responsibility for the school.   The question I often get is, “Why would you want your growing church to be connected with a Christian school?” That question is often followed with a vivid reminder of the risk involved in leading a school, and occasionally there’s even a scary anecdote thrown in for emphasis. 32   We are all acquainted with the “Three R’s” of education: reading, writing, and arithmetic. In this article, I will show you the “Three R’s” of why our church took leadership of a local existing Christian school: the ROUTE, the RISK, and the REWARD. 1. The ROUTE: How did we get here, and what pro- cess did we use to form this relationship? From the church side, it began with an awareness that we have the responsibility to ensure our children are properly discipled and trained. Although this commitment has been part of the church from our inception, we realized that our efforts were inadequate during a strategic planning and prayer session in early 2014. From the school’s perspective, it was obvious that the lack of a clear, overarching vision and strong leadership were a great hindrance to the school moving forward.   Both organizations realized that the other had something that they needed. The school had a structure, student body, and existing framework for educating children with a Christian worldview. The church had vision, passion, and resources to help the school succeed.