The RenewaNation Review 2015 Volume 7 Issue 1 | Page 34

  Indeed. Conestoga is now one of the largest manufactur- ers in the county, with a reputation not only for employing outstanding craftsmen, but for paying them well and treat- ing them fairly.   “They’ve been trying to live their lives so thoroughly consistent with their religious faith,” says Randy Wenger, Chief Counsel with the nearby Independence Law Center, who knows the family as neighbors as well as clients. “The way they live out their faith in trying to serve others … to really be Christian light and truth, pervades everything, in terms of the way they run their business.”   Wenger recalls encountering a group of Russian refugees working in the Lancaster plant—only one of whom, it turned out, understood any English. The Hahns had hired all of them, knowing the group would be able to make a better wage working together, at the factory, where only one would have to speak the language. “ “If the government can force the Hahns to violate their sincerely held religious beliefs just to engage in a livelihood … that sets a dangerous precedent. If the government can do that to them, it can certainly do much worse to others.”   “I love the Hahns,” Wenger says. “Just the fact that they’re real people, in everything they do. They do good work, and they’ve got a lot of customers because they do good work. God has blessed them in their business, and they’re looking in every way that they can to build back into the Kingdom of God.”   That same determination, though, now has the Hahns at odds with their own government … and every effort they’ve made to explain their actions and beliefs has been lost, so far, in translation.   The Department of Health and Human Services’ 2012 abortion pill mandate stunned Christian business owners across America, including the Hahns. The law dictates that all employers must underwrite, as part of their employees’ insurance benefits, life-ending abortion drugs. Those who 34 decline to pay for their employees’ abortion pills risk fines of $100 dollars a day … per employee. Few businesses of any size can sustain a financial penalty of $36,500 a year, per employee.   By refusing to grant them religious exemptions for the mandate, then, the government is, in fact, ordering busi- ness owners—whatever their personal views on the sanctity of human life—to actively support abortion, or risk crip- pling fines.   “I’m really disappointed,” Lemar says. “We’re Christians. We don’t believe in taking life. And now … here we are.”   “This is a moral concern for us,” Anthony says. “We actu- ally have a sanctity of life statement that we put together that says we believe that life begins at the instant conception takes place. Nobody has a right to take that life except God. So we really don’t want to be in a business of providing drugs to our employees that could potentially cause abortion.”   But standing for that conviction puts the Hahns on the horns of another dilemma: confronting their very own government.   “Mennonites don’t go to court,” says Wenger, whose Inde- pendence Law Center was recruited by the family to defend them. “Here, they needed to go to court to be able to protect their rights.” Convincing the Hahns of that, he says, meant reaching “I wouldn’t say a comfort level, but an understand- ing, of what needed to be done. They want to be able to run their business, serve their clients and their employees in a way that honors God. So, ‘Okay, we need to go to court.’”   “It was soul-wrenching,” Anthony says. “We’re nonresis- tant, peace-loving people. We’re not in the legal world, doing a lot of lawsuits and things. So that was really troubling … to stand up and make that stand. But we felt we needed to. We just did not want to go against what we believe.”   “Norman Hahn was almost in tears, as he was speaking to us about the moral dilemma that this was creating for them,” says Wenger. “They want to live their lives according to their faith. Now, for the first time in 300 years, the government is telling them they can’t. Instead, they’re the enemy of the state, and the enemy of the government’s new policy.”   “That just seems wrong, for the government to create enemies … when these are people who only want to serve. These are genuinely good people. And they only want to do good. [Yet they’re] being treated like they’re doing some- thing bad to society.”