The New Jersey Police Chief Magazine | May 2025
Revolution or Risk? The Role of AI in Police Report Writing and its Ethical and Legal Implications in New Jersey
By Donald Pavlak, EDs.
Abstract The integration of artificial intelligence( AI) into contemporary law enforcement practices signifies a notable evolution in administrative efficiency and technological innovation. A particularly promising yet contentious application of AI is in police report writing— a fundamental component of the criminal justice process. Proponents of AI adoption highlight enhanced efficiency, a reduction in administrative burdens, and improved clarity in documentation. Conversely, these advantages are balanced by several ethical concerns, legal ambiguities— especially within specific jurisdictions like New Jersey— and the significant issue of inherent bias embedded within AI systems. This article critically examines the current utilization of AI in police report writing, the associated ethical and legal dilemmas, and the societal risks posed by algorithmic bias. Through an in-depth analysis of both existing practices and foreseeable implications, this article aims to provide a rigorous, evidence-based perspective on the use of AI in a domain where accuracy, fairness, and transparency are paramount.
Introduction The preceding decade has witnessed an accelerated deployment of AI technologies across numerous sectors, with law enforcement being no exception. Faced with escalating caseloads, heightened public scrutiny, and constrained resources, police departments are increasingly exploring AI as a means to improve operations. Police report writing, a labor-intensive yet crucial task, has emerged as a key area for AI integration. These reports serve as foundational documents in criminal investigations, legal proceedings, and institutional accountability. Consequently, the introduction of AI into this process raises critical questions not only regarding efficiency and accuracy but also concerning civil liberties, due process, and the equitable administration of justice. In New Jersey, this consideration is particularly salient given the state ' s robust privacy laws and ongoing dialogues surrounding police reform. For instance, data from the New Jersey Courts( 2024) shows a 15 % increase in the average caseload per officer over the last five years, underscoring the pressure for efficiency gains. This article seeks to unpack the multifaceted implications of AI-assisted police report writing, beginning with an overview of current technological applications before scrutinizing the ethical, legal, and social dimensions of this rapidly evolving practice. It argues that while AI offers potential benefits for police report writing in New Jersey, its implementation needs careful consideration of unique state legal frameworks, rigorous ethical safeguards against inherent biases, and robust oversight mechanisms to ensure fairness and accuracy.
Current Applications for AI in Police Report Writing A leading example of AI in police reporting is Axon’ s“ Draft One,” a tool leveraging OpenAI’ s ChatGPT-4. This platform uses audio from police body-worn cameras to automatically generate preliminary versions of police reports. Beyond mere transcription, the system employs natural language processing to perform entity recognition( identifying individuals, locations, and items) and relationship extraction( understanding how these entities interact within the incident). This results in a structured narrative that officers can later review and modify, significantly reducing the time spent on administrative tasks and potentially minimizing human error in the first drafting phase. Similarly, Truleo’ s Field Notes, powered by Amazon’ s Bedrock AI, transcribes, analyzes, and extracts pertinent data from bodycam recordings, aiding officers in preparing more comprehensive reports based on actual recorded interactions.
While comprehensive adoption rates in New Jersey are not yet publicly available, these tools are being deployed in police departments across the United States, with preliminary feedback suggesting a substantial reduction in report drafting time— in some cases, by up to 70 %( Axon, 2024). Pilot programs in other jurisdictions have shown that AI-generated drafts not only saved time but also contributed to more uniform and legible reports, potentially ensuring that critical details are not omitted due to factors such as officer fatigue or oversight. Proponents contend that these benefits enhance departmental efficiency overall, allowing officers to return to patrol or investigative duties more quickly.
However, these applications are not without contention. Critics argue that these tools may misrepresent officer interactions or misinterpret context, particularly if the AI struggles with slang, emotional tone, or non-verbal cues present in the audio. Linguists specializing in natural language processing( Smith & Jones, 2023) have noted the inherent challenges AI faces in accurately interpreting pragmatic aspects of language, such as sarcasm or implied meaning. Given the critical role of police reports in legal contexts, the margin for error remains exceedingly narrow. Furthermore, the technical limitations of current AI in handling complex scenarios involving multiple speakers or ambiguous audio quality raise concerns about the reliability of AI-generated narratives in diverse real-world situations.
Ethical Considerations The integration of AI in police report writing ethically raises fundamental questions about accountability, accuracy, and the appropriate role of machine-generated documentation within the legal process. A primary concern is the potential for“ hallucinations” in AI output— instances where the AI incorporates plausible but factually incorrect or misleading information into the report. This can occur due to poor audio quality, background noise interfering with transcription, or the system extrapolating information beyond what was actually recorded. In a legal context, such errors could lead to wrongful prosecutions, erode public trust in the criminal justice system, and ultimately harm defendants who must challenge inaccurate or biased reports. For example, an AI might misattribute a statement to the wrong individual present at a scene, altering the factual basis of subsequent legal actions.
Another ethical consideration is the opacity of AI systems. Unlike traditional documentation where errors can often be traced back to
28
Continued on next page