Classroom Close Up
An Interview with Eric Litwin
Young Fans of Eric
I started adding music and movement to engage children, then they started to read and comprehend
Appleman, D., & Graves, M. (2012). Reading better, reading smarter: Designing literature lessons for adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Beck, I.L., & McKeown, M.G. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author. New York, NY: Scholastic.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.
Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.
Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centered classroom (2nd ed.). Portland, MN: Stenhouse Publishers.
Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria: ASCD.
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2008). In a reading state of mind: Brain research, teacher modeling, and comprehension instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10): 906–911.
Mahn, H. (2003). Periods in child development: Vygotsky’s perspective. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev, & S.M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural
context (pp. 119-137). New York, NY: Cambridge.
Myhill, D., & Warren, P. (2005). Scaffolds or straitjackets? Critical moments in classroom discourse. Educational Review, 57(1), 55-69.
Ness, M. (2017). Think big with think alouds, grades K-5: A three step planning process that develops strategic readers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Oczkus. L.D. (2018). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension (3rd Ed.). Newark, DE: ASCD.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh-A response to C. Addison Stone's "The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 370-373
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1: 117–175.
Panadero E. & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Annals of Psychology, 30 (2), 450–462.
Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research Vol. 2 (pp. 815–860). New York: Longman
Pearson, P. D. & Gallagher, M.C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-344
Rodgers, E. (2004). Interactions that scaffold reading performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 501-532.
Rodgers, E., D’Agostino, J.V., Harmey, S.J., Kelly, R.H., & Brownfield, K. (2016). Examining the nature of scaffolding in an early literacy intervention. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(3), 345–360.
Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind,
Culture, and Activity, 1 (4), 209-226.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University
Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364
Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1991). A theory of teaching as assisted performance. In P. Light, S. Sheldon, & M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning to think (pp. 42-62). New York: Routledge.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Winne, P. H. (2017). Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (52-64). New York: Routledge.
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key sub-processes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307–313
were able to determine the effects that activity had on their heart rates.
● Auditory strategies. Students used the program “Mystery Science” to listen and follow an experiment to determine the effectiveness of bird beaks in different environments. One of the student’s mothers, a nurse, volunteered as a guest speaker. Students interacted with working models of the heart, and were able to hear the sound of a healthy and unhealthy heartbeat.
● Motivational strategies. Students were able to connect with their classmates by
completing a class wide survey about what their favorite physical activities were to stay healthy. The class graph led to informative and engaging conversation about staying healthy
● Formative assessment results. The instructional tasks during this unit provided an opportunity to incorporate technology in a developmentally appropriate way. Students were able to take the information they learned and experienced from the guest speaker and apply it in their writing.
Table 1 illustrates the intervention schedule followed throughout this project.
Table 1 Intervention schedule.