The Missouri Reader Vol. 37, Issue 2 | Page 38

freshmen and sophomores. A self-report data collection tool and voluntary survey was constructed to answer the overarching research questions and determine if there was a correlation between the amount of high school foreign language instruction and English ACT scores for underclassmen. A link to an anonymous, voluntary survey was sent to all freshmen and sophomores enrolled at one university in southwest Missouri through the university’s e-mail system. Students were asked the number of semesters they completed foreign language instruction before attending the university and their ACT composite score and English section score. Students were also asked to identify their primary language, languages studied before attending college, and number of semesters they studied a foreign language prior to college. Additionally, students were asked if they believed studying a foreign language helped them in other subjects in school. Findings The findings of our inquiry are presented following our discussion of the ACT in response to our initial research question. Understanding the current form of the ACT and identifying the benefits of language learning, while connecting it to our students’ perceptions, has been valuable for advocating for more second language learning at the collegiate level. Connecting Second Language Learning to Student Inner Understanding of Language When the ACT test was established in 1959, one of the objectives was “to provide information helpful to colleges both in the process of admitting students and in ensuring their success after enrollment” (ACT, 2011a, para. 3). Today, the ACT seeks to evaluate high school students’ educational development and readiness for college in five different areas: English (75 questions), Math (60 questions), Reading Comprehension (40 questions), and Science Reasoning (40 questions). Additionally, there is an optional writing portion to assess students’ ability to plan and write an essay. The tests are measured on a 1 to 36 scale with scores in each of the tests and subtests as well as a composite score, which is the average of all four tests. Understanding of usage and mechanics. The English section of the ACT test measures students’ understanding of the English language in two main areas. One area (40 questions) measures understanding of usage and mechanics of standard written English such as punctuation, grammar and usage, and sentence structure. The other area measures understanding of rhetorical skills (35 questions) such as strategy, organization, and style (ACT, 2011b). The test does not measure spelling, vocabulary, or memorization of grammar rules. English skills are measured in context using five essays or passages with words and phrases underlined and numbered to match specific questions. Some questions also refer to the context of the whole passage. The passages vary in topic and are chosen for the appropriateness in assessing knowledge of writing skills and because they relate to students’ interests (ACT, 2011b). For the usage and mechanics part of the test (53% of the whole English test), the ACT distributes the questions in the following manner: punctuation (13%), grammar and usage (16%), and sentence structure (24%) (ACT, 2011b). The ACT official website states the goal is to measure students’ understanding of the use of punctuation marks in relation to meaning. In the following example, taken from the English Reading Workout for the ACT (2011), the test taker has to decide the best use of the comma in the underlined section. If the passage is correct as it is written, the test taker should choose option a (the best option is d). ©The Missouri Reader, 37 (2) p.38