The Missouri Reader Vol. 37, Issue 2 | Page 31

awareness and phonics instruction, and by the end of second grade, the ELLs’ reading skills were comparable to those of the native English speakers. In some cases, ELLs even outperformed the native English speakers (Lesaux & Siegel, 2003). Results from this study propose that “kindergarten phonological awareness instruction in the context of a balanced early literacy program is as effective for ESL speakers as it is for L1 speakers in the early grades” (Lesaux & Siegel, 2003, p. 1016). Lesaux and Siegel (2003) concluded that with effective instruction, ELL students are able to make similar gains in reading as native English speakers within the classroom. Before starting formal instruction in reading and writing, it is a good idea to begin by building up the child’s oral language capabilities through authentic discussions and explicit modeling. Once a child has a basic grasp on oral language skills, he or she is ready for more guided instruction in reading and writing with reading texts matching the oral language skills of the child (Verhoeven, 1990). “The extent to which minority children succeed in identifying with the majority language and culture appears to be important for the course of their reading development in the second language” (Verhoeven, 1990, p. 109). Allowing English Language Learners to receive the same quality instruction in phonemic and phonological awareness, orthographic processing, word recognition, vocabulary, comprehension strategies, and writing within the same classroom context as their peers can result in favorable results (Calderon et al., 2011; Deacon, Wade-Woolley, & Kirby, 2009; Fitzgerald, 1995; Slavin & Cheung, 2005). English Language Learners submerged in the socioculture of an American classroom with a well-balanced literacy program do, in fact, have the potential to show significant growth in their reading and writing skills (Gyovai et al., 2009; Schultz, 2009; Serna, 2009). Methodology A causal-comparative research design was used for this study in which achievement scores in reading and writing of English Language Learners in kindergarten were compared with achievement scores in reading and writing of native English speaking students in kindergarten. The English Language Learners were selected as the comparison group and native English speaking students were considered the control group. Reading and writing achievement scores were obtained from 58 kindergarten students over a three-year period. Of these 58 students, 11 were English Language Learners. Therefore, for this study, scores were obtained from 47 native English speaking kindergarten students and 11 English Language Learners in kindergarten. The classroom from which these scores were obtained abided by district curriculum expectations all three years, and the instruction was presented by the same teacher. Furthermore, this classroom implemented Reader’s and Writer’s Workshop on a daily basis. This included daily execution of shared reading, read alouds, word study, independent learning centers, independent reading, guided reading, independent reading and ܚ][