The Missouri Reader Vol. 36, Issue 1 | Page 63

throughout the eighteen week instructional period. The researchers compared and monitored the students‘ progress. Hicks and Villaume (2001) concluded that ―children respond in different ways to instruction‖ (p. 407). Instruc tional Strategies These instructional strategies will enable special education teachers to use Reading Recovery intervention practices in their classrooms. Each teacher is unique and every student is different. The strategies presented in this article can be adapted to meet individual needs. Routman (2003) admonishes teachers to ―adapt ideas to fit your particular school, students, beliefs, and contexts‖ (p. 6). Vaughn, Moody, and Schumm (1998) found that many teachers feel they do not have time to individualize instruction. The special education rooms have large numbers of students preventing the teachers from providing differentiated instruction. The instructional strategies included in this article provide ways to individualize instruction without ignoring the rest of the class. The components of the Reading Recovery program can be adapted to the special education room. The components are: Rereading, Running Record, Letter Identification or Word Analysis, Writing a Story, Cut-up Sentence, New Book Introduced, and New Book Attempted. Each component can be worked into the special education schedule providing there is a classroom paraprofessional or a volunteer. First, the students are placed in small groups based on their reading level. The paraprofessional begins rereading with the group. He or she models how a good reader reads and the students practice reading. The books are books that have been previously read. While the students are rereading, the special education teacher works with an individual student from the group at another table. The student reads a familiar text while the teacher takes a running record. The running record can be completed quickly while the student reads and analyzed later to examine miscues. When the student is finished, he or she returns to the group and the teacher works with another student. This continues until every student has worked individually with the teacher. Next, the paraprofessional works on letter identification activities or word analysis activities with the group. This can include Elkonin boxes, stretching words, and spelling words. The activities for this component will change as the abilities of the students change. During the letter identification or word analysis component, the special education teacher will once again work with the students from the group one at a time. The student will write a story. The length will depend upon the ability of the student. The teacher and the student work together to sound out new words as the story is written. The teacher writes one sentence on a sentence strip and then cuts it apart. The pieces are put in an envelope with the completed sentence written on the outside of the envelope. This activity is repeated with the rest of the group. The teacher joins the paraprofessional and the small group for the next component. The new book is introduced to the group. Multiple copies of the book are needed so each student can take a book walk and explore the new book. As the teacher, paraprofessional, and students investigate the book, the students are building background for the initial reading of the story. For the final part of the lesson, the paraprofessional takes over the small group again. He or she is available if the students need assistance while they assemble their cut-up sentences. The students can self-check their work by looking at the sentence printed on the envelope. Once the sentence is assembled, the student reads it. If the group has time, they can share their sentences with each other. The special education teacher works with one student from the group. The student will attempt the new book. The goal is for the student to read as much as he or she can without assistance. If the student struggles too much, the teacher will assist with the reading. Then, the student will attempt independent reading again. This is repeated with © The Missouri Reader, 36 (1) p.63