The Missouri Reader Vol. 36, Issue 1 | Page 50
selection interesting or easy. We hope this study
can be a springboard for teachers and educators
to start valuing boy struggling readers‘ voices and
hear what they have to say about themselves. We
encourage teachers to conduct a similar interview
or survey with each student in his/her class, to
establish a reader profile for each student, and to
use the reading profiles to make instructional
decisions and offer students in their classrooms
choices in the materials they read.
References
Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the
social sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA:
Pearson.
Bluestein, N. A. (2010). Unlocking Text
Features for Determining Importance in
Expository Text: A Strategy for
Struggling Readers. Reading Teacher, 63(7),
597-600.
Burke, C. (1980). The reading interview. In B.
P. Farr & D. J. Strickler (Eds.), Reading
Comprehension: Resource Guide.
Bloomington, IN: Indianan University
ReadingPrograms.
Clark, C., & Foster, A. (2005). Children’s and
young people’s reading habits and
references: The who, what, why, where, and
when. London: National Literacy Trust.
Enriquez, G., Jones, S., & Clarke, L. (2010).
Turning around our perceptions and
practices, then our readers. The Reading
Teacher, 64, 73–76.
Goodman, Y., Watson, D., & Burke, C. (2005).
Reading miscue inventory. Katonah, NY:
Richard Owen Publishers, Inc.
Guthrie, J., & Davis, M. (2003). Motivating
struggling readers in middle school through
an engagement model of classroom practice.
Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 59-85.
Guthrie, J., & Greaney, V. (1991). Literacy acts.
In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, &
P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading
research (Vol. 2, pp. 68-96). New York:
Longman.
Guthrie, J., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement
and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil,
P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr
(Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol.
3, pp. 403-425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle
school: Complexities among young
adolescent readers. Reading Research
Quarterly, 34, 172-192.
McKenna, M.C., & Kear, D.J. (1990).
Measuring attitude toward reading: A
new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher,
43, 626-639.
Millard, E. (1997). Differently literate: Gender
identity and the construction of the
developing reader. Gender and Education,
9(1), 31-48.
Moje, E. B., Young, J. P., Readence, J. E., &
Moore, D. W. (2000). Reinventing
adolescent literacy for new times: Perennial
and millennial issues. Journal of Adolescent and
Adult Literacy, 43, 400-410.
National Center for Education Statistics (2010).
Digest of Education Statistics: 2009.
Retrieved February 1, 2010, from
http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d
09/ch_2.asp
Odean, K. (1998). Why great books for boys?
Book Links, 7(6), 58.
© The Missouri Reader, 36 (1) p.50