The Missouri Reader Vol. 35, Issue 1 | Page 19

Writer’s Workshop Literacy teachers know that reading and writing are strongly connected. Hurst, Wilson, Camp, and Cramer (2002) state, “As a rule, when children are engaged in both reading and writing, as one is strengthened, so is the other” (p. 94). Writer’s Workshop is an effective approach to integrating these two vital skills. Beers (2003) explains this method, “In a workshop environment students write in response to what they’ve read so that the readingwriting connection is reciprocal--one informs the other” (p. 58). In a co-taught classroom, Writer’s Workshop can be enhanced by having another teacher in the classroom. Presented here are examples of each approach to co-teaching and one way Writer’s Workshop can be utilized during instruction. Alternative teaching. In a Writer’s Workshop model, this approach to co-teaching is powerful. One teacher works with the majority of the class presenting mini-lessons or focused lessons, while the other teacher works with a small group of students on specific skills they have not yet mastered. The benefit of this approach allows the majority of students in the class to continue their learning rather than holding them back to reteach specific skills to a small number of students who need additional teaching or practice. Station teaching. Station teaching is valuable during the editing and revising stage of the writing process. Both teachers and occasionally a student expert set up an instructional station around the room. Students rotate or float between stations receiving instruction, support, feedback, or guidance on their writing piece, depending on the task. This allows students to individually gain the level of support they need to progress in their writing skills, rather than whole-class instruction focused on the majority of the students’ needs. Parallel teaching. At times the whole class may need instruction in the same specific skill; however, students’ needs vary and research shows that students benefit from differentiated instruction. Parallel teaching provides the structure to accomplish this task. One teacher provides instruction on a writing technique through examples in literature and think-alouds, while the other teacher provides direct instruction of the same skill. Prior to teaching with this approach, both teachers collaborate to determine the best strategies to use as well as how to divide the students successfully. Team teaching. In a co-taught classroom, team teaching enhances Writer’s Workshop through different viewpoints while modeling writing or presenting a mini-lesson. While one teacher presents the content of the lesson, the other teacher makes purposeful comments at appropriate times during the lesson to focus and guide the instruction toward students needs. Mini-lessons are alternated between teachers in order for students’ to benefit from both styles of teaching. Conclusion Presented here are starting points for teachers who find themselves in a co-teaching situation. Co-teaching does not have one particular method to follow. The teachers involved must find what works best for their situation. Like students, co-teachers need time and practice to develop their skills. Co-teachers typically begin at a co-existence level where they get to know each other. Throughout the school year, they learn to co-work together. Gradually, the teachers are able to co-plan, co-instruct, and through all of this collaborating, a co-teaching classroom emerges. When implemented correctly, co-teaching can enhance the effectiveness of instructional lessons taught in an inclusive classroom. The result is a positive co-teaching environment for teachers and students in which “two heads are truly better than one.” References Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education. Beers, K. (2003). When kids can’t read: What teachers can do. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. 19