The Locksmith Journal Nov-Dec 2016 - Issue 47 | Page 49

PROUD SPONSORS OF THIS PAGE
FIRESAFETY & SECURITY • 49
QUALITY OVER QUANTITY A manual door closer designed to work in more extreme situations like a school , if correctly specified and fitted from the outset , will more than pay for itself in a few years and will ensure that fire doors are kept closed and open easily throughout the designed life cycle of the building . They will also help to protect the frame and the hinges and even surrounding walls . Quality door component manufacturers have closers that are tested to 10,000,000 cycles which would equate to a door that opens 500,000 times a year for 20 years .
On the flip side , the money and time on labour spent replacing a lower quality product will leave the authority or school far worser off financially , without even considering replacing the door from the countless times it gets damaged or fixing holes from screws .
Using a fire door check list to ensure your doors and door hardware meet requirements is a good way to make sure your fire doors are legal and safe .
ELECTROMECHANICAL SOLUTIONS
A good alternative to wedging doors open is to use door closers that link with an electro-magnetic hold open system to the fire alarm . If there is a fire and the fire alarm activates , the system automatically releases the doors and let them shut . Alternatively , a free-swinging electro-magnetic door closer linked to the fire detection system will facilitate a barrier free operation to the door , whilst still allowing the door to be manually closed if required , such as a class room door .
Final exit doors are often fitted with panic exit devices to provide safe and effective escape through the doorway with minimum effort , and without prior knowledge of operation . In many schools it is often the case that entrance doors will also be one of the fire exits for the building , which brings the security of the building into question . Security measures should never compromise the ability of occupants to escape from the building .
An electromechanical panic exit device such as the Briton 571 EL could be considered . It works like a normal exit device , instantly opening to allow immediate exit , but it can be integrated
with access control systems which means that outside access can be gained by either using a remote button or local keypad , without comprising security or the safety of pupils and staff in the event of a fire .
ONGOING ASSESSMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
In local authority schools responsibility for fire safety is usually shared between the authority and the headteacher . Between them , they are responsible for meeting all relevant building standards , including the installation and maintenance of fire alarm systems , and the ongoing compliance with fire safety legislation and fire safety management within the school . In independent schools , responsibility generally rests with the owner of the building .
The headteacher , proprietor or other staff members who are responsible for the building users ’ safety are required to perform regular fire safety and risk assessments . The main duties include :
• Ensure necessary persons are trained on fire safety
• Conduct fire safety inspections such as ensuring escape routes are clear and fire exit doors are unlocked from the inside
• Ensure firefighting equipment meets regulations
• Check fire alarms and smoke detectors work correctly and effectively
You can visit the UK ’ s official government website for more information about fire safety risk assessments in educational premises .
Allegion also offer a Try Me & Keep Me Programme , where expert advice on the right door closers for your application is offered and fitted for free .
Call 0121 380 2400 , www . allegion . com
LOCKSMITHJOURNAL . CO . UK | NOV / DEC 2016