The Locksmith Journal Jul-Aug 2014 - Issue 33 | Page 37

PROUD SPONSORS OF THIS PAGE HISTORYOFLOCKS Emory Stockwell, superintendent at Yale’s bank lock division until his death in 1891, patentee of the Yale Pindial Time Lock. Stockwell was awarded numerous patents relating to time locks. April 1831) was awarded to an English inventor William Rutherford Jnr. and described thus:“… The object of this invention … is to secure for a given period of time, property consigned to safes … The dial wheel, by means of toothed gearing, is engaged with and made to revolve at a regulated speed by a pinion that obtains motion from clockwork actuated by springs or weights” But reliability and length of time on guard were both drawbacks for most early models and any prospective users. But this story is about the Yale ‘Pindial’ lock also sometimes known as the ‘Button’ lock. The Pindial also found favour amongst the English safe makers; indeed, many examples found in the UK are from safes or strong rooms by Victorian manufacturers such as Milner and Chubb. In 1872, Yale introduced - initially with 48 hour movements by Seth Thomas - their Pindial Time Lock, and a design largely by Emery Stockwell who was superintendent at Yale’s Yale plaque from a safe fitted with a Yale Time Lock, it would be futile to try and open until the set time had elapsed. bank lock division. The Thomas movements proved unreliable, however, and were very quickly changed to 56 hour movements by E. Howard. Sometime during the 1880s the standard movement changed to 72 hours. At the time the lock was sold for around $400, plus $50 if the optional weekend attachment (introduced in 1876) was also purchased. Although the price is similar to other competing time locks of the day, it must have cost considerably more to produce - if for no other reason than the large number of component parts. It is interesting that the price remained the same through its life. The case was bronze and finished in nickel plate, measuring 190mm wide x 160mm high x 75mm deep, and weighing in at 6.4kg. The door had a small lock to secure it and prevent tampering; it also has a glass panel into which two eyelets have been fitted to enable the winding of the movements. Once set it was not necessary to open the door, as the winding each day was all that To read more, visit www.locksmithjournal.co.uk was required and this could be safely left to untrained staff if desired. The most innovative feature though, is the two dials, one for each movement, each consisting of 24 pins. Each pin is capable of locking or unlocking for each of the designated hour for which it is set, and needing no further or adjusting other than winding the movements. This feature does not appear again in the UK for some 75 years, with the Chubb electric time lock that was produced during the early post-WWII years. A redesigned/engineered version, the Single Pindial Lock, was introduced in1884. It still had dual 72 hour E. Howard movements, but with both movements operated with the one dial. This offered both cost and space savings. It is worth noting that Yale was the first to introduce modular movements in time locks. About 4,000 Pindial Locks were made during its lifetime (1872-1907). There are thought to be low hundreds of Pindial Time locks to have survived to date, mostly in the USA, with perhaps a dozen in the UK. Most common An early Flyer from around 1875, illustrating the early lock with Seth Thomas 48 hour movements. are the versions without the weekend attachment with E. Howard 62 hour movements. The 56 hour versions are rare, even more so are the 56 hour versions with weekend attachments. No Pindials with Seth Thomas movements have been recorded or known to exist – unless you have one and know different! The Time Lock is now firmly established as part of the global security armoury. Operating and setting instructions for the Yale Pindial are available to COLTi and TLCA members to download from their respective forums. Brian Morland, curator of the Heritage Collection of locks and keys, welcomes comments and corrections on historical aspects of locks and keys. Brian can be contacted by e-mail: [email protected] THE JUL/AUG 2014 ISSUE SPONSORED BY TRADELOCKS 37