The Lens Magazine Aug. 2017 | Page 69

The Soft Issue August 2017 Story from Within The union’s statement titled: Time to Let Go, is a repertoire of redundant and perplexing sentences. Here is an excerpt from the statement: “… On the trending issue, we would like to register our displeasure over the unfortunate event that has snowballed into a conflagration. We wish to admit that the development is regrettable but not out of place, as lessons have been learnt and bridges have been built. Similarly, we wish to state here that the sealing of the office of the lecturer concerned is not intended, but a show of discontent by some union officials, whose intention, though sincere, yet overboard! We therefore sue for peace and urge for ceasefire among all stakeholders concerned. Time has come to let go and keep up with the developmental agenda of the university of Ilorin.” ---Time to Let Go, March 17th, 2017. AMCOS’s press release which has words like sorry, apologise, and forgive appearing eight times combined, reads thus: “The brightness of situation prompts this release as it is said that nothing is wrong until something goes wrong. It has become obvious of our attitudes towards the association, the entire executive members cherish and appreciate you as we know we’ve erred, we’ve made some mistakes, some decisions have been made without your consent, but we thought it was for progressive reasons, and we seek apologies.” --- It is High Time, March 22nd, 2017. There are different perspectives to look at the circumstances that may have led to the birth of the two statements. One, that the PRO, huddled behind his desk in a hermetic office; rivulets setting upon his forehead; and jabbing the screen of his tablet manically, is determined to make sure his statement is as harrowing to the reader as it were for him during the writing. Two, that the writer thinks he has attained that intellectual high-horse that guarantees him license to serenade his audience with nebulous words. Foul throwing. In a conscious milieu, these press releases, especially the one issued by AMCOS, should be sparking outrage— the is this how we taught you? type of outrage. But it didn’t. This makes one wonder, do people read these press releases? Do they turn blind-eye to these errors as long as they get the gist? Or are they fascinated by the abstruse grammar contained in it? Whatever the answers to these questions, they simply tell the nature of the milieu they operate. Only a few organisations have the resources to issue a 69 statement that works. It is therefore not surprising that some organisations outsource this function to public relations experts. Others would hire journalists to perform this role. The argument is that since press release is structured in 5Ws and H format and journalists spend their whole career writing that who best to write it? In the case of the students’ union and AMCOS, they cannot hire the services of professionals—they, instead have their own PROs who are saddled with the responsibility of handling their communication and information functions. After reading these statements, one is embraced by a sense of loss and pity: Loss, because all of the grammar rules one has learnt is humbled by the vortex of the statements: pity, because these boys are the next-gen political appointees. They would convene conferences and sign press statements to sate the nation’s hunger for information. Rather than salve that hunger, they would exacerbate it. To be fair to these boys, government and its ministries’ press releases can equally be terrible. Their goal is to trumpet the trivial and obfuscate value—a path the union is toiling towards diligently. The rapid pace at which these press releases circulates, as BCs and other forms, means that the secret is out. Everyone who reads these messages know what olodo the person who wrote the messages is. And this is an embarrassment to both the students, who are not dummies and the school itself. Ironically, the media that are waiting to devour the school would have saved it, unwittingly, from embarrassment. How? The press releases the students are writing wouldn’t have seen the light of day. But the students played themselves. All their press releases were distributed via WhatsApp, Facebook groups, and loosely handled blogs. By choosing these channels, they have successfully shown that, for all the years they have spent in school, they still ain’t shit. Students’ unions are not known to write vibrant and up-to-standard statements. Instant messaging, and microblogging have opened an expressway for them to reach their audience with ease; they are not shy to take advantage of these opportunities. But since they are failing terribly at press release writing, it is better they backslide to the old method of convening students and screaming “Of the greatest…” above their heads. Or they should simply find anot her name for whatever they are writing because those things are not press release, in all sense of it. the LENS