180 B. Johnson: J Extra Corpor Technol 2025, 57, 178--180
support diversity [ 18, 19 ]. Additionally, building strong alumni networks can improve the educational experience by providing mentorship, career guidance, and financial assistance to current students [ 20 ].
While these strategies lay a strong foundation, sustained change will require active policy engagement. Policymakers must build on these efforts by advocating for increased funding of allied health education programs and promoting policies that reduce financial barriers to entry. Federal and state legislators must recognize perfusionists as an essential component of the allied health workforce.
Conclusion
The rising cost of education in perfusion technology represents a considerable barrier for aspiring professionals and threatens the sustainability of the workforce at a time when the demand for perfusionists is increasing. With total educational expenses often surpassing $ 100,000, many students encounter significant debt burdens that may discourage them from entering the field or restrict their long-term career development. By promoting collaborations between educational institutions and healthcare organizations, improving financial aid options, and advocating for increased funding, we can ease the financial burdens facing prospective students. Together, we can create a more accessible and sustainable educational environment, benefiting healthcare systems and patients.
References
1. Johnson B. The feasibility of centralized application services for perfusion education programs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025; 57( 1): 50--52.
2. Johnson B. The feasibility of a national matching service for perfusion education program applicants. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025; 57( 1): 53--55.
3. Johnson B, Martin M, Reagor J, Tung A. Thirty years of perfusion licensure in the United States: exploring current concepts and developing new strategies for the future. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025; 39( 7): 1832--1841.
4. Hessel EA, 2nd, Groom RC, Sundt TM, 3rd. Perfusionists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists-- a history of successful multidisciplinary collaboration: What’ s next? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025; 39( 7): 1842--1843.
5. Iwamasa D, Thrasher M. An analysis of instructional expenditures in U. S. public higher education from 2004 through 2015. Plann Higher Edu. 2019; 47( 3): 5--22.
6. Lai J, Fang E, Chan TM, Tekian A, Ibrahim H. Tuition costs of master’ s of health professions education programs: a crosssectional analysis. Acad Med. 2023; 98( 11): 1319--1325.
7. Webster P, North SE. Health professions educational debt: personal, professional, and psychological impacts 5 years postgraduation. Front Med( Lausanne). 2022; 9:746463.
8. Austin JW, Evans EL, Hoerr HR, Jr. Distributed perfusion educational model: a shift in perfusion economic realities. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005; 37( 4): 360--363.
9. Colligan M. Results of the 2019 Survey on perceptions of vacancy and turnover among perfusionists in the United States. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2020; 52( 1): 27--42.
10. Stammers AH. Perfusion education in the United States at the turn of the century. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1999; 31( 3): 112--117.
11. Toomasian JM, Searles B, Kurusz M. The evolution of perfusion education in America. Perfusion. 2003; 18( 4): 257--265.
12. Syracuse PL, Beckley PD. Master’ s education for perfusion: Is it needed? Is it important to future sub-specialization? J Extra Corpor Technol. 1993; 25( 3): 93--100.
13. Sistino JJ. The case for a single entry level into the perfusion profession by 2020. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014; 46( 2): 127--129.
14. Colligan M, Patel K. A single entry level into the perfusion profession is not the solution. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014; 46( 4): 324--325.
15. Bruno F, Nizzer S, Moreira NA, et al. Developing and retaining homecare nurses through employer-based tuition assistance programs: a mixed methods study. J Community Health Nurs. 2024; 41( 3): 175--188.
16. Rowan K, Shah SV, Knudson A, et al. Health professional retention in underserved areas: findings from the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program participants in the United States, 2019--2021. J Public Health Policy. 2024; 45( 4): 639--653.
17. Locke E, Dong F, Stiles R, Kellerman R, Ablah E. The influence of loan repayment and scholarship programs on healthcare provider retention in underserved Kansas. Kansas J Med. 2019; 9( 1): 6--11.
18. Camacho A, Zangaro G, White KM. Diversifying the healthcare workforce begins at the pipeline: a 5-year synthesis of processes and outputs of the scholarships for disadvantaged students program. Eval Health Prof. 2017; 40( 2): 127--150.
19. Mutevere M, Dzinamarira TR, Muzenda L, et al. Empowering underprivileged students beyond financial aid: Insights from a scholarship program’ s monitoring and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 2024; 105:102448.
20. Cree-Green M, Carreau AM, Davis SM, et al. Peer mentoring for professional and personal growth in academic medicine. J Investig Med. 2020; 68( 6): 1128--1134.
Cite this article as: Johnson B. Investing in the future: addressing the rising cost of perfusion education in 2025. J Extra Corpor Technol 2025, 57, 178--180. https:// doi. org / 10.1051 / ject / 2025029.