The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology No 57-3 | Page 12

122 I. Condello: J Extra Corpor Technol 2025, 57, 119--122
risks. Continued research is essential to refine ECMO deployment strategies, enhance real-time monitoring and management techniques, and ultimately, to ensure that this critical care tool can be used to its full potential without undue harm.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Data availability statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Author contribution statement
Ignazio Condello conceived the study, conducted the literature review, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted and critically revised the manuscript. The author has approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was not required for this narrative review as it did not involve human or animal subjects or patient data. References
1. Goel NJ, Kelly JJ, Patrick WL, et al. Malperfusion in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: a nationwide analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2025; 119( 5): 980--989.
2. Capoccia M, Maybauer MO. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation in aortic surgery and dissection: A systematic review. World J Crit Care Med. 2019; 8( 8): 135--147.
3. Geirsson A, Szeto WY, Pochettino A, et al. Significance of malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: outcomes and need for additional revascularizations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 32( 2): 255--62.
4. Meani P, Gelsomino S, Natour E, et al. Modalities and effects of left ventricle unloading on extracorporeal life support: a review of the current literature. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017; 19( Suppl 2): 84--91.
5. Donker DW, Brodie D, Henriques JPS, et al. Left ventricular unloading during veno-arterial ECMO: a simulation study. ASAIO J. 2019; 65:11--20.
6. Girdauskas E, Kuntze T, Borger MA, et al. Surgical risk of preoperative malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 138( 6): 1363--1369.
7. Berretta P, Patel HJ, Gleason TG, et al. IRAD experience on surgical type A acute dissection patients: results and predictors of mortality. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 5:346--351.
8. Conzelmann LO, Weigang E, Mehlhorn U, et al. Mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: analysis of pre- and intraoperative risk factors from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A( GERAADA). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49: e44--e52.
9. Santamore WP, Burkhoff D. Hemodynamic consequences of ventricular interaction as assessed by model analysis. Am J Physiol. 1991; 260: H146--H157.
10. Li Y, Yan S, Gao S, et al. Effect of an intra-aortic balloon pump with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 55: 395--404.
Cite this article as: Condello I. Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to surgery in type A aortic dissection: a review on strategic approach to managing malperfusion syndrome. J Extra Corpor Technol 2025, 57, 119--122. https:// doi. org / 10.1051 / ject / 2025015.