|
Background The NANA board of directors extensively discussed the Ambler Access Project and its alignment with the corporation ’ s values and criteria for responsible resource development . Following thorough deliberation , the board made the decision to withdraw from further involvement with AAP . This choice was prompted by several key factors :
1 . Unmet criteria : Despite initial engagement and evaluation , AIDEA failed to meet NANA ’ s specific criteria for responsible development , including controlled access , protection of subsistence resources , job creation and community benefits .
2 . Insufficient consultation : NANA expressed concerns about the lack of meaningful consultation throughout the project ' s development ,
|
particularly as it pertained to the interests of Alaska Native corporations and the broader community .
3 . Bureau of Land Management ' s ( BLM ’ s ) final SEIS : NANA voiced apprehension regarding elements of the BLM ’ s Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ( SEIS ), which it believed exceeded legal boundaries and threatened the socioeconomic interests of Alaska Native corporations .
4 . Commitment to stewardship : The decision reflects NANA ’ s commitment to stewarding ancestral lands and safeguarding the Iñupiat way of life , emphasizing the importance of responsible development practices and inclusive decision-making .
|
Next steps :
• NANA will not renew AIDEA ’ s surface access permit , signaling its disengagement from the AAP .
• The corporation will continue to advocate for self-determination over resource and infrastructure development impacting its region and shareholders .
• NANA remains open to future opportunities for mineral development in the Upper Kobuk that align with its criteria and values .
• Despite withdrawing from the AAP , NANA will remain involved in processes related to the project as it affects its lands , including ongoing legal proceedings .
|
Communication efforts :
• The corporation will conduct further engagement with shareholders , communities and Tribes to communicate the rationale behind its decision and address any concerns .
• NANA will provide resources and information to stakeholders interested in learning more about AAP and related developments .
Ultimately , NANA ’ s decision underscores the need to ensure that any project in our region and on our lands is in partnership with entities that understand and are aligned with our people ’ s values to ensure responsible development , which advances community well-being and the preservation of our way of life .
For more information on AAP , please visit nana . com / aap
|