The Human Condition: The Stephen and Pamela Hootkin Collection Sept. 2014 | Page 26

Sculpture is different. It is less safe. The proscenium arch is gone and it invades and shares our space. When one encounters a figure, there is a sense that it might leap out, particularly when the size approaches or exceeds human scale. Peter Gourfain’s pots are essentially contemporary. They In the theater of life, the pot’s shape offers a kind of carry no particular baggage from the ceramic past. His proscenium arch that protects us from a full-frontal manner of surface handling on pots is tied to banded assault of its content. It is like being an audience in decoration. Certain motifs are repeated with slight a theater. The play may be engrossing, but the line changes all the way around the pot, which encourages between viewer and actor is not (usually) broken. viewers to involve themselves in the circular process. For In this sense, reading a pot is more like viewing a some reason I always think of the merry-go-round when painting except that a pot is in the round. It is kinetic I look at his work. The two pots, Untitled #2 from the in that the line moves to the edge of a silhouette series Ohio Pot (1980) and Untitled (1985), both employ and then swoops around to the other side. the illustrative device, the former in black oxide. The relief carving of the latter, drawn from woodblock-like imagery evokes nostalgia for the 1930s when this style was popular, particularly in book illustration and with social issues such as trade unions and workers’ rights. Sculpture is different. It is less safe. The proscenium arch is gone and it invades and shares our space. When one encounters a figure, there is a sense that it might leap out, particularly when the size approaches or exceeds human scale. Our bodies therefore become I have dealt with the vessels separately not just because complicit with the sculpture. The two bodies meet it brings together a single family of forms. Pottery is not halfway in a mediated space between reality and different in that it is lesser than sculpture, but because imagination. This is theater in the round where there some of its tools of visual appreciation are singular. is little separation between audience and actor. Pottery owns an independent aesthetic built up over 14,000 years of service and evolution. One does not read a pot with figures the same way one reads a human-scale figurative sculpture or a painting. It is helpful to make a distinction and divide the works of the Hootkin collection into two parts: Those that are collaborations between form and painting—the painted figure—and those that remain essentially Pots offer intimacy that comes with their familiar monochrome in a more classical sculptural tradition— domestic role. In that sense pottery feels safer than the earth figure. The one deals with danse carnaval a lot of other contemporary art, which can appear and the other with danse macabre, or light vs. dark. aggressive and intimidating. Bear in mind that almost every pot shape and function comes from two pr imal functions, serving food and storing it. And even when a pot is not meant for use, such as the lidded vessels of Kraus and Eberle, they still link to this functional root. 24 THE PAINTED FIGURE In the Hootkin collection, the starting point for the painted figure is Michael Lucero. He is the core sculptor in this part of the collection, the same anchor for sculpture that Kraus is