The Hultian Spring 2017 | Page 43

"The fall of the Soviet Union represented a great opportunity for the world to mend Cold War wounds" beyond its territorial boundaries. As such, Stalin convinced both Churchill and Roosevelt that a post-World War II world would need to take the Russian security fears into consideration and include a curtain of buffer states in its periphery. In other words, “Russia’s security and global influence have always been linked to the state’s ability to defend itself from attack”. To achieve this they have expanded their borders into more geographically defendable locations, sometimes forming buffer states that could serve as early warning systems in case of a massive attack. The fall of the Soviet Union represented a great opportunity for the world to mend Cold War wounds and join together in the same march. However, the Americans were less interested in bringing Russia closer to the west and more determined to declare the triumph of capitalist democracies versus socialist oligarchies. The United States has failed to use its tools, such as Nato, to reshape its foreign policy so that it reflects a world where Communism is no longer a relevant enemy. Instead, and while proudly wearing the colors of victory against its ideological adversaries, communism has “perpetuated the logic of confrontation and division”. From a strategic point- of-view, both Russian and Western interests in Ukraine seem to be undoubtedly strategic in nature, just as Cold War 2.0