The HOA Board Quarterly Spring 2014 Issue #9 | Page 10

Addressing Neighbor to Neighbor Issues by James R. McCormick, Jr., Esq. O ne major difference between an association and other corporations is that all of the members of an association are neighbors. This simple fact creates most of the emotional aspects of association living. One misconception held by many people living in associations is that the association exists to resolve disputes between them and their neighbors. Owners often demand that the board take action against a neighbor who has parties lasting long into the night which keep the owner up and otherwise spoil their peaceful enjoyment. While an association should enforce its governing documents, the decision of whether to enforce a particular rule or covenant is the board’s to make. More importantly, however, the association is not a landlord and has no obligation to resolve disputes between neighbors. One quality that has been unfortunately lost in communities today is neighborliness. We bought into any particular association because we loved the home, the neighborhood, the school district, the proximity to local areas, etc. If nothing else, we share these things in common. So why is it that we generally are no longer “neighborly?” The answer to this question is more than we can resolve in this article. The question itself is a poignant example of a belief we must change. Our home is often our largest investment. If we cannot live peacefully in our home, where can we live peacefully? It was not too long ago that neighbors stopped by to chat or to borrow a cup of sugar. It was not very long ago that neighbors all pitched in to help each other and a neighborhood was truly a community. While we may not be able to determine why this has changed, we can take actions to change it back. Dispute has existed as long as mankind itself. Wars have been waged and fought for hundreds of centuries. So what makes the current climate different? Perhaps the answer is the close proximity in which we all live or the additional stresses we all place on ourselves. Rather than waging war on our neighbors, however, we should stop and think about alternate ways of resolving our disputes. Be the bigger person. Look for steps you can take that may resolve the issues. As an owner, do not rely on the association to be your police force. As a board member, do not allow an owner to use the association as a tool to harass neighbors. Owners should approach neighbors and discuss concerns. Bring a bottle of wine or some cookies to your neighbor and talk about the issues that annoy you. More often than not you will discover someone that shares common goals, desires and stresses. Instead of a hated neighbor you may find a friend. 10 | The HOA Board Quarterly | Issue #9 | Spring 2014 Understanding that the idealistic society does not exist, if approaching your neighbor in a friendly manner does not resolve the dispute, more formal action may be necessary. Rather than attempting to force the association to be your police force, look into alternate methods of resolving the dispute. Local agencies exist in most major cities that offer low-cost mediation or other dispute resolution processes. Look into these alternatives and make a conscious effort to resolve your differences in this manner. Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution process that, if successful, will achieve a resolution with which both parties are at least mostly content. Litigation should be looked at as an option of last resort. While mediation achieves a result that both parties accept, litigation will result in one party “winning” and one party “losing.” Regardless of whether you are the winner or the loser, you will likely still live next door to your neighbor. Even if you win, the animosity and sideways glances cast at you by your neighbor as you arrive home may not be worth the win. As a board member of an association you must understand that the association is not intended to resolve disputes between neighbors. The association was formed to enforce the governing documents and likely maintain common areas within the community. The board members must understand that attempting to resolve disputes between neighbors is not the proper function of an association. While the board can encourage owners to resolve disputes, spending association funds trying to force two neighbors to like each other is not proper and should be avoided not only for legal reasons, but for political reasons as well. Unless the actions of one or both of the neighbors are a violation of the governing documents, the association should stay out of the dispute. By starting with ourselves and our actions, we can return our neighborhoods to communities and avoid forcing [