The Hammonton Gazette 12/11/19 Edition | Page 5

Noise ordinance introduced at Nov. 18 council meeting Page 4 • Wednesday, December 11, 2019 • The Hammonton Gazette COUNCIL, from Page 1 “There’s some situations where people are making a little too much noise, and we’re just trying to be careful that we can get some- thing on the books that’ll solve that problem, and at the same time not be problematic and cause un- intended consequences down the road for businesses. It’s a tough thing to do,” DiDonato said. According to Councilman Michael Torrissi, part of the rea- son for this ordinance came at the request of the Hammonton Police Department, who, without the backing of an ordinance, had been previously powerless to properly address the concerns of residents. “We needed something. Chief (Kevin) Friel said they can’t go out and do anything if there is no ordinance. At least if there’s an or- dinance they can go out and give somebody a warning or go back and do something. Prior to it, without an ordinance, you can’t say anything to anyone,” Torrissi said. The discussion of such an ordi- nance had been in front of town council for a number of months, according to Torrissi, who was originally opposed to the ordi- nance in its earliest forms. “The first one said we were going to have a study from Rut- gers University, we’re going to send people to classes, we’re going to have portable decibel machines to carry around; that was ridiculous. We got rid of that,” Torrissi said. Furgione concurred with Tor- rissi’s assessment. “That was far, far too restric- tive. This, at least, is not so restric- tive. It won’t be so burdensome on the residents ... I wanted to take that 15 or 20 page document and try to consolidate it down so we’re not just chasing our tails here,” Furgione said. The ordinance as it was intro- duced on November 18 was con- solidated to just five pages. It prohibits noise that is “plainly au- dible at a distance of 50 feet from the building, structure, vehicle, or place in which the noise is emanating” between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., from Monday to Friday; and between the hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday. An additional prohibition, ac- cording to the language of the or- dinance, is for “the operation other than between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, of any pile driver, steam shovel, bulldozer or other earthmoving machinery, pneumatic ham- mer, derrick, steam or electric hoist or other appliance, the use of which is attended by loud or unusual noise.” Examples of loud, disturbing and unnecessary noises include, but are not limited to: radios, tele- visions, phonographs, loudspeak- ers, amplifiers for advertising, yelling, shouting, animals, horns, steam whistles, exhaust, vehicle defect, drums, hawkers, pile driv- ers, and so forth. Notable exceptions to the ordi- nance include the following: •The use of bells or chimes by churches in church activities •Activities of the municipal de- partments in the performance of their duties, drills, public demon- strations, or disaster warning, alarm or alarm systems. •Publicly sponsored activities on public streets, sidewalks, in the public parks, playgrounds or pub- lic buildings under the permission or authority of the municipal offi- cials. •The playing of a band or or- chestra in a hall or building or in the open air during a publicly sponsored performance. •Any public utility as defined in Title 48 of the New Jersey Statutes, or to any employees of a public utility when the public util- ity or its employees are engaged in performing work to prevent the threatened interruption of its serv- ices or to terminate the interrup- tion of its service rendered to its customers. •The use of school bells, alarms or sound amplifiers by schools. •Parades conducted in compli- ance with the Ordinances of the Town of Hammonton. •Activities or events approved by Town Council through Resolu- tion or Ordinance •The “warming up” of diesel motors of motor vehi- cles when located at an existing, operating commercial or indus- trial business operation •Refrigeration units attached to commercial vehicles required for the transportation of those goods that require same. Those last four exemptions were important sticking points for several members of town council. “I wanted to make sure that businesses were exempted out. I wanted to make sure we didn’t have an issue with all of the dif- ferent festivals that we do,” Fur- gione said. These were also of paramount concern for Torrissi. “There were several changes that had to deal with business, commercial, agriculture, the hours were changed, the days. We spec- ified events such as Mt. Carmel week,” Torrissi said. DiDonato stressed the impor- tance of exempting businesses, whose operations often rely on noisy vehicles throughout the night. “We want to make sure we don’t affect businesses. They have no choice. They’d love for those things to be quieter, but they have to hold that product and get it to the market. We didn’t want to put something in place that was so tough for industry and jobs that we would lose jobs in town, be- cause then that hurts John Q. Pub- lic. It was a gentle balancing act,” DiDonato said. Furgione noted that the ordi- nance may not be without its flaws, but it is necessary for the town—and is far preferable to its previous version. “Is it perfect? Probably not. It’s a starting point, and we’ll go and we’ll see how we do with it. If it needs to be modified, I’m sure that we can modify it at some point in the future. At least it gets us a starting point of something, and it’s a lot less restrictive than the original noise ordinance pro- posed,” Furgione said. Violation of this ordinance car- ries a fine of not more than $2,000, imprisonment for not more than 90 days and/or a pe- riod of community service for not more than 90 days. Torrissi said that with this ordinance, the police will be able to act in the in- terests of the public without taking extreme action. “We sounded like we were going to throw people in jail for being too loud. This is kind of wa- tered-down, so to speak, but at least we have something in place that gives the residents some course of action to call a police if there really is an issue ... In my opinion, the noise ordinance is in- tended for the loud neighbor who’s having the loud music and party outside, and when you go say something they turn the music up,” Torrissi said. DiDonato was of a similar mind in regards to the intent and spirit of the ordinance. “It’s a good ordinance for the town of Hammonton ... Every- body should have the opportunity to go outside and be safe and be welcome in their own backyard without feeling like a prisoner, or feel uncomfortable. I enjoy a good party and friends as much as the next guy, but at the same time, my fun cannot hinder somebody else’s sleep and their family and their fun and their investment in the community,” DiDonato said. Furgione said that it was his hope that the mere existence of the ordinance would be enough to curb noisy neighbors before it rises to the level of legal action. “I would honestly hope that everyone could be neighborly, and we’ll never have to deal with this ... Hopefully, if an officer shows up one time, everyone’s able to work it out. I don’t think an officer wants to write a ticket, and I’m certainly sure we don’t want to drag anyone to court. It gives everyone a basis, and hopefully everyone can just play nice,” Fur- gione said. The Gazette also contacted Councilwoman Brooke Sacco, who declined to be interviewed but texted the following comment: “I encourage anyone with ques- tions or concerns regarding the or- dinance to come to the meeting/second reading and share them with Mayor & Council. That’s my comment,” Sacco wrote in her text. The second reading of the ordi- nance will take place at the next meeting of town council, which will be held on Monday, Decem- ber 16 at 7 p.m. in town hall.