The Flawless Vision The Flawless Vision | Página 118

The Flawless Vision
89
I became angry?
Dadashri: No. It is because you saw her fault that you
are saying that Chandubhai is the one at fault. The fault is always
separate from the one who seemingly does it. In this case
Chandubhai reacted to a fault arising in his interaction with his
wife. The fault arose as a result of the interaction with her. It
does not exist independently and therefore no one is the owner
of the fault. In other words all are faultless. The One who is
separate from Chandubhai, The self is eternally aware of this,
Chandubhai is not. Therefore the Self sees the reaction of anger
as the fault of Chandubhai. The Self never sees anyone at fault,
but the existence of the fault is recognized. You will not see the
wife as being at fault.
Again, You are not really seeing the wife’s fault but really
You are seeing Chandubhai’s fault. Therefore, the fault is yours.
Questioner: I realize that after I become angry.
Dadashri: Even after becoming angry, do you see
Chandubhai as the one at fault?
Questioner: Yes.
Dadashri: Only then is it considered a fault. It is considered
a fault only after it has occurred. The fault of the other did not
arise and the fault of the self (Chandubhai) was seen. You will feel
that Chandubhai is guilty.
Questioner: Yes that is exactly how I feel.
Dadashri: Chandubhai will feel that the wife is at fault.
But You will feel that it is Chandubhai who is at fault. Chandubhai
is the one who has seen his wife’s faults and become angry with
her and so Chandubhai is the one at fault.