The European Union in Prophecy The EU in Prophecy I | Page 219

The European Union in Prophecy
misery; their complaints, if they ever dared to complain, were treated with insolent
contempt.
The courts of justice would always listen to a noble as against a peasant; bribes
were notoriously accepted by the judges; and the merest caprice of the aristocracy had
the force of law, by virtue of this system of universal corruption. Of the taxes wrung
from the commonalty, by the secular magnates on the one hand, and the clergy on the
other, not half ever found its way into the royal or episcopal treasury; the rest was
squandered in profligate selfindulgence. And the men who thus impoverished their
fellow subjects were themselves exempt from taxation, and entitled by law or custom
to all the appointments of the state. The privileged classes numbered a hundred and
fifty thousand, and for their gratification millions were condemned to hopeless and
degrading lives." (See Appendix.)
The court was given up to luxury and profligacy. There was little confidence
existing between the people and the rulers. Suspicion fastened upon all the measures
of the government as designing and selfish. For more than half a century before the
time of the Revolution the throne was occupied by Louis XV, who, even in those evil
times, was distinguished as an indolent, frivolous, and sensual monarch. With a
depraved and cruel aristocracy and an impoverished and ignorant lower class, the
state financially embarrassed and the people exasperated, it needed no prophet's eye
to foresee a terrible impending outbreak. To the warnings of his counselors the king
was accustomed to reply: "Try to make things go on as long as I am likely to live; after
my death it may be as it will." It was in vain that the necessity of reform was urged.
He saw the evils, but had neither the courage nor the power to meet them. The doom
awaiting France was but too truly pictured in his indolent and selfish answer, "After
me, the deluge!"
By working upon the jealousy of the kings and the ruling classes, Rome had
influenced them to keep the people in bondage, well knowing that the state would
thus be weakened, and purposing by this means to fasten both rulers and people in
her thrall. With farsighted policy she perceived that in order to enslave men
effectually, the shackles must be bound upon their souls; that the surest way to
prevent them from escaping their bondage was to render them incapable of freedom.
A thousandfold more terrible than the physical suffering which resulted from her
218