Case Studies : Learning from the Past
Let ’ s review several case studies which highlight the balance that must be struck between regulatory adherence and trust administration .
1 . Bank of New York Mellon : Asset Management and Compliance Strain
In Carolee A . Kennedy Trust v . Bank of New York Mellon , 974 N . Y . S . 2d 891 ( N . Y . Sup . Ct . 2013 ), beneficiaries alleged BNY , as trustee , overcharged fees , failed to adequately disclose these charges , and mismanaged trust assets due to excessive compliance focus . The beneficiaries argued their financial interests were secondary to BNY ’ s compliance priorities , indicating a failure to uphold the duties of loyalty and accountability . BNY defended its actions , citing the need to meet heightened regulatory standards , particularly around transparency and fee disclosure .
Lesson Learned : This case underscores the risks of prioritizing compliance optics over fiduciary duties . Trustees must ensure compliance mechanisms enhance their core fiduciary responsibilities . Corporate counsel and compliance officers can help strike this balance by reviewing processes for transparency and adequate disclosure .
2 . Citibank : Fiduciary Failures in Asset Allocation
In Matter of Lowenstein Trust v . Citibank , N . A ., 104 A . D . 3d 445 ( N . Y . App . Div . 2013 ), beneficiaries accused Citibank of breach of fiduciary duty , alleging imprudent investment practices . The bank was accused of deviating from the Prudent Investor Rule , resulting in financial loss to beneficiaries . Citibank justified its actions as part of broader compliance efforts .
Lesson Learned : Trustees must integrate risk management into compliance procedures to ensure regulatory obligations do not unduly influence investment strategies . For instance , trustees can establish independent investment committees to mitigate potential conflicts between regulatory and fiduciary goals .
3 . Wells Fargo : Neglected Beneficiary Communication
In Smith v . Wells Fargo Bank , N . A ., 703 F . Supp . 2d 1031 ( S . D . Cal . 2010 ), Wells Fargo faced a lawsuit alleging breach of fiduciary duty stemming from inadequate communication with beneficiaries . The beneficiaries argued the trustee ’ s failure to communicate eroded trust and undermined their ability to make informed decisions . Wells Fargo attributed the communication gaps to resource constraints imposed by compliance obligations . The court noted the duty of accountability cannot be subordinated to compliance demands , reaffirming the trustee ’ s obligation to maintain open , clear , and regular communication with beneficiaries .
Lesson Learned : Trustees must prioritize beneficiary communication as part of their compliance efforts . Regular , clear updates on trust performance can help bridge the gap between regulatory reporting and beneficiary expectations .
____________________________________________________
Case Studies : Where Corporate Trustees Excelled
1 . Fidelity Trust Company : Dual-Team Approach
Fidelity Trust implemented a two-tiered structure , separating compliance functions from fiduciary management . This approach resulted in beneficiaries reporting high levels of satisfaction , and regulatory audits confirming full compliance with minimal operational disruption .
Lesson Learned : Segregating compliance and administration functions can help trustees excel in both areas .
2 . State Street Bank : Emphasizing Transparency and Beneficiary Communication
State Street Bank avoided pitfalls of miscommunication by adopting a robust transparency policy . Its trustees ensured beneficiaries received clear , detailed reports on compliance related decisions , including the rationale behind investment strategies . In doing so , State Street upheld both the duty of accountability and regulatory standards , earning praise in In re State Street Bank , No . 10-CV . 04567 , 2019 WL 7387211 ( Mass . Prob . Ct . Dec . 20 , 2019 ).
Lesson Learned : Transparent communication is a cornerstone of successful trust administration and compliance integration .
These cases highlight the balance required in trust administration and demonstrate how trustees can develop strategies to meet regulatory obligations without neglecting their fiduciary responsibilities .
____________________________________________________
Strategies for Restoring Balance
Here are several strategies to implement which integrate compliance obligations into fiduciary duties , ensuring neither aspect is neglected :
1 . Integrated Compliance Framework
Corporate trustees should develop an integrated compliance framework aligning regulatory obligations with fiduciary responsibilities . This can include incorporating compliance checks into regular trust management routines so regulatory tasks do not become an afterthought . This framework ensures compliance activities are aligned with the broader goals of trust administration .
2 . Regular Risk Assessments
Trustees should conduct regular risk assessments to identify areas where regulatory compliance may conflict with fiduciary duties . This proactive approach helps trustees adjust their administrative tactics or operational practices to ensure regulatory compliance and beneficiary interests are being addressed .
3 . Leverage Technology
Emerging technologies like AI , blockchain and automation are transforming trust administration by streamlining compliance , enhancing transparency , and reducing administrative burdens . By understanding and integrating advanced technologies , corporate trustees can enhance operational efficiency and compliance accuracy which reduces the dilution of day-to-day trust administration .
4 . Ongoing Trustee Training
Corporate trustees must receive regular training on fiduciary duties and the regulatory landscape . Implementing internal employee training , or investing in external educational programs , which highlight regulatory changes , industry best practices / standards and corporate requirements ensures trustees are equipped to balance compliance and their duties as trustees . ____________________________________________________
The evolving regulatory landscape demands vigilance and adaptability from corporate trustees . While regulations are essential for maintaining financial integrity , they must not overshadow the core purpose of trust administration . By learning from past challenges and adopting proactive strategies , trustees can navigate this complex environment effectively , ensuring regulatory compliance enhances , rather than hinders , fiduciary duties . �
THE DOCKET - MARCH 2025 | 27