First Case continued from page 54 extending cross-border judicial cooperation beyond the Mainland-Hong Kong framework to a broader range of offshore jurisdictions. By clarifying the legal status and the specific boundaries of the duties of foreign liquidators in the Mainland, the case overcomes a long-standing practical bottleneck where foreign administrators were unable to take over or dispose of assets within the Mainland. This reduces institutional friction and costs associated with cross-border liquidations and enhances the efficiency of global asset recovery and unified disposal.
Chinese Enterprise continued from page 17
tice between the two jurisdictions. In Re Jiangsu Shunchuan Shipping Development Co Ltd [ 2020 ] SGHC 140, the Singapore High Court recognized bankruptcy proceedings opened by the Nanjing Intermediate People ' s Court in Jiangsu Province, marking the first recognition of a Mainland Chinese insolvency proceeding by a Singapore court. In 2021, the Xiamen Maritime Court recognized and assisted a Singapore insolvency proceeding in Re Xihe Holdings Pte Ltd, marking the first reported case in which a Chinese court recognized a foreign insolvency proceeding outside the framework of a treaty arrangement. Singaporean courts have shown a more openness toward insolvency proceedings commenced in Mainland China. On 11 April 2025, the Singapore High Court granted recognition and assistance to the restructuring proceedings of Jiangsu Delong Nickel Industry Co., Ltd., a major Chinese industrial group undergoing reorganization proceedings before the Xiangshui People ' s Court in Jiangsu Province. Although the number of reported cases remains limited, these decisions are highly significant. All three cases were decided in the absence of a bilateral insolvency treaty, a Model Law framework, or any formal judicial cooperation arrangement between China and Singapore.
The Singapore- Indonesia MOU provides a useful point of reference, but a China Singapore framework would require important modifications. China ' s judicial structure is considerably more centralized than those of many other jurisdictions. Any formal arrangement would likely require the involvement and support of the Supreme People ' s Court. As demonstrated by the Mainland China- Hong Kong mechanism, implementation through designated pilot courts could provide a manageable and effective model. Currently, Article 5 of China ' s Enterprise Bankruptcy Law( EBL) largely remains the principal statutory basis for recognition and assistance in cross-border insolvency matters. Under this Article, issues relating to public policy, judicial sovereignty, national security, and protection of domestic stakeholders would inevitably require careful consideration. Accordingly, a China- Singapore arrangement would likely contain more detailed safeguards and reservation clauses than some existing cooperation instruments.
A future China- Singapore MOU could draw valuable lessons from this experience. Potential elements might include designated courts, direct court-to-court communications, information-sharing protocols, recognition of insolvency officeholders, coordinated management of parallel proceedings, and procedural guidelines for complex restructuring cases. Such mechanisms would promote cooperation while respecting the legal and institutional characteristics of both jurisdictions. V. Concluding Remarks The Singapore- Indonesia Insolvency MOU is significant not merely because it establishes cooperation between two neighboring jurisdictions. Its broader importance lies in what it
continued on page 56
55