The DayAfter NOVEMBER 16-30, 2016 ISSUE | Page 63

entertainment bollywood in Profit Share somebody losing money are also reduced. If everyone were to take their entire fee upfront, the cost of the film would be so high that in case it doesn’t do well, the losses would also be equally high,” explains Shah. To be sure, the profit-sharing arrangement remains the monopoly of male stars. As far as the leading ladies are concerned, the discussion remains limited to raising fees. “The top female leads are all working with A-list actors and you can only share profits with one actor in the film, you can’t do it with all because then what will the producer be left with? And obviously because our films are male-centric, it is the hero,” Nahta explains. “Secondly, heroes get paid 5-10 times more than the heroine, so it makes sense for them to take a share in the profits.” For film-makers then, the big issue remains the high upfront fee most of the top actors continue to insist on. “It’s simple. The first-day box-office collection is a response to what the fan following of the star is. So your flat fee should be akin to what your opening- day collections are, not more than that,” says Ajit Andhare, chief operating officer, Viacom18 Motion Pictures. “The problem is that at the current level, the flat fee is far higher than the first-day collection and some people demand almost twice their Day 1 earnings. So the producer has to spend a lot of time in recovering the flat fee itself.” Insisting on a very strong fee, coupled with profit sharing, ensures that talent benefits even if nobody else does, says Andhare. “It’s a very adversarial situation that needs to move to a more equilibrium level where talent realizes that producers and investors are also in the business to make money and not for the sheer joy of making cinema,” he adds. Feedback on:[email protected] November 16-30, 2016 The Dayafter 63