The Cleveland Daily Banner | Page 6

6—Cleveland Daily Banner—Wednesday, January 6, 2016 www.clevelandbanner.com TACIR From Page 1 actually accessible to every home and business in the block. Owen focused on wired connections in his presentation Tuesday. Tennesseans can also access broadband Internet through wireless or mobile connection in many areas. Maps showing the areas that have these connectivity options will be reviewed at TACIR’s next meeting. “The data (map) shows us that a census block is covered even if one address in the census block receives coverage,” Owen said. TACIR board member Jeff Huffman, Tipton county executive, asked how Tennessee’s connectivity availability compared to other states. Owen said this information was not available at this time, commenting that staff could research this. Hazlewood said the term broadband Internet could mean “different things to different people.” He defined it as “highspeed internet service that is always on and at least 4/1 Mbps (megabits per second).” However, Hazlewood said capacity of the service to a given location is not always the typical speed a person can get. He discussed issues such as “Network Latency — the time it takes for a data packet to get from one network point to another usually measured in round trip time (RTT), (and is) affected by distance and congestion” and “throughput — completed end-to-end data transfer.” He said small files, such as email, transfer quickly at 5 mbps. The larger the file the more capacity is needed to send the file in a timely manner. Hazlewood mentioned the medical industry as one example of an organization needing a high broadband capacity. He said Tennessee needs to take a long-range approach to the issue, recommending that “1 gigabit per second would be an optimum capacity for a 10year Tennessee Broadband “I would suggest for consideration the areas where private industry … are not willing to service, then perhaps government nonprofits should have a role to provide the infrastructure. I would consider in a rural area that the government nonprofit provides the infrastructure; it doesn’t mean they have to provide the service.” — Victor Hazlewood Vision or plan.” “These broadband Internet issues are clearly necessary in rural Tennessee, especially in terms of industrial development,” Huffman said. “That is one of the first questions we get asked is, ‘Can you offer broadband?’” Tennessee Rep. Mike Carter, R-Ooltewah, said cost of service compared to the salaries in a service area needs to also be studied. “If it’s not affordable, it doesn’t matter if it’s there,” Carter said. In Tennessee, broadband Internet access is offered via DSL, cable modem, fiber, wireless or satellite. Hazlewood said each of these types of connections offer different maximum capacities. The types of devices that people are trying to access the Internet with also vary across the state, ranging from computers to farm equipment. Hazlewood said having access to broadband Internet would allow many farmers to use equipment to its full potential. He said that if service could get to a building on the property, then farmers could use wireless directional antennae to get broadband access to their field. Iliff McMahan Jr. of the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development said the hills prevalent in areas of the state could limit the success of this technology. “I would suggest for consideration the areas where private industr