The Bridge CLIL volume 1 | Page 34

84 T E A C H I N G THROUGH A FOREIGN LANGUAGE students to understand a foreign language close to their mother tongue in terms of vocabulary, grammar or pronunciation. This is why instruction of more subjects that mainly rely on verbal communication (such as history and political science) can start quite early if it is carried out in related languages (e.g. Spanish for Italians, or Dutch for Germans). Such languages can in fact be used throughout the curriculum. Non related languages (e.g. German and Italian), on the other hand, should be used to teach subjects in which the verbal component is foremost only if learners already possess a good level of competence in the foreign language, to avoid excessive simplification in the presentation of contents on the part of the teacher. Such restriction mainly applies to the secondary school level. All the above considerations should be taken into account for long-term planning and education policy. Short-term intervention, however, may call for less ambitious choices necessarily influenced by the human and material resources available (cf. 2.5, 3.2). 2.3 Schools Researchers encourage experimentation with different content subjects, methodological approaches and with learners of different ages. The implementation of CLIL also varies according to the different school systems. Types of schools Due to its practical nature and flexibility, CLIL can be incorporated in different types of schools: both state and private. The diversity of approaches can be observed through a variety of modalities. With regard to the age of learners, experiences range from kindergarten to secondary level of education. CLIL can be used for certain time periods, as tasks within the overall school curriculum and educational framework or implemented as optional subjects in secondary schools. Subjects, modules and projects can all be taught through CLIL.