Test Drive | Page 58

Eastern Partnership Photography Luciano Gloor: Audiences have to be taught to ‘read’ pictures Luciano Gloor, Team Leader of the Regional Monitoring & Capacity Building Unit (RMCBU) of the Eastern Partnership Culture Programme, shares his thoughts on the role of photography and prospects of transnational photography projects in the Eastern Partnership and beyond. – Among other areas of culture in Eastern Partnership countries, where would you place photography? What would you say is the role of photography in shaping the cultural development in the Eastern Partnership countries? – To begin with, let me say some words on the role that images play and in general the role of what we see for our perception of reality. Mankind is by nature a very visual species. What we see influences us more than what we hear. In human interpersonal communication, only 30% of the exchanged information results from the spoken words, while we draw 70% of the information from the non-verbal communication that, whether we want it or not, is exchanged between communicating people. This must be so, because human communication is older than language and verbal communication. Meaning, whether we believe, what we hear, whether we will remember what we hear, whether we find relevant what we hear, and so on, depends by 30% on the words that we hear, but by 70% on how they are communicated to us. I can’t give you a percentage, but there is for sure one auditive component in this non-verbal communication, which is the voice that speaks, and how we emotionally perceive it. But the big chunk of this 70% non-verbal communication consists of what we see. The non-verbal 58 exchange of interpersonal communication goes through body language, face mimics and the overall visual perception of the speaker by the listener as well as of the contextual set-up, the situation in which the communication is happening. Thus, almost 70% of the information is created by the effect of what we see. What does this has to do with photography, you will ask. Well, a lot. The world started already decades ago to become a world dominated by images. In the era of the Internet this effect has increased exponentially: written text and spoken words are less and less, still and moving pictures are more and more flooding our senses and our perception, in all media, offline and online, printed and digital, in the news, in advertisements and publicity, in films and on television, in social media and more and more even in direct interpersonal exchange among individuals, where “selfies” and photo shots are replacing written text. What was the beginning and forms the basis of nowadays universe of images? It is photography! Even moving pictures are nothing but photographic stills that are shown at a speed that make our eyes, our brain, believe that they see movement and animated pictures. In other words, photography has become the dominating medium for our society. As a result, the role of pictures in shaping our perception of culture, in shaping our perception of the world, in shaping our image of who we think we are and where we belong to and who we are not and do not belong to, thus also in shaping our values and attitudes, has become enormous. This is especially true of the role that photographic pictures play. Why? Photography is a technology and a craft that claimed since its invention to replace all other forms of human visualisation because of being superior to them in depicturing the world: it climed to be able to duplicate, to mirror reality. A painter depict his own personal vision of what he sees, and thus a painting is by its nature always a subjective reflection of what is depicted. Now, a photographer uses a technical device, the camera, that in a more or less “objective” mechanical-optical process records what is depicted and thus it can clime to be the closest to reality, in any case much closer than a subjective painting. For better or for worse, this became the predominant perception of photography, the medium that allows us to record and preserve the reality of our life, of events, of our society. We had to go through the terrible aberrations of authoritarian and inhuman propaganda regimes in the 20th