Test Drive | Page 87

BROKEN IMAGES 79 conversely, a scientific community consists of men who share a paradigm” (Kuhn 1996: 176). The concept of paradigms contradicts positivism. There is an irony, perhaps often missed, in the similarity between Kuhn’s notion of paradigm and Comte’s original postulations on the passing of historical epochs. Yet, taken together, the work of Kuhn and Foucault constitute a direct refutation of the central claims of positivism. Rather than science being an objective means of coming ever closer to absolute truth, it is a social process and one which is intrinsically linked to the exercise of power in society. Foucault and Kuhn set forth an epistemology that fundamentally contradicts the positivist aspiration to discover universal social law.4 Applying Epistemology: a Positivist Thought Experiment To consider further the difference between positivism and post-positivism as theoretical frameworks producing different types of images, the two epistemologies are applied to the same case study – the visual landscape of Belfast. In the aftermath of the peace process in Northern Ireland a conscious effort has been made to change the content of public murals in the city (Community Relations Council 2009). Such attempts seem to suggest a negative relationship between the murals and post-conflict communal integration. A positivist approach would prioritise establishing a causal relationship between murals, and community relations. A useful research question is: have the political murals in Belfast reinforced community division? To address this question, the researcher must assume two variables – political murals (V1) and community division (V2) – are measureable. The material nature of V1 would enable researchers to record the prevalence of political murals quantitatively with little difficulty. V2, being more abstract, would need to be defined by the researcher with quantifiable, determinate factors of community division. In Belfast, researchers might conceivably decide to measure factors such as: levels of paramilitary activity, membership and support; known instances of sectarian violence; the number of marches and protests by political parties and community organisations; and voting behaviour. It may also be deemed appropriate to conduct a series of opinion surveys among residents in the areas to analyse the level of hostility towards an opposing community. If such an experiment was enacted and the suggested criteria measured, it 4 See Kuhn (1970) for an elaboration on the perspective regarding paradigms.